Abstract
This contribution outlines a research proposal combining ethical guidelines on AI
and a law-as-data approach. Building upon the definitions of soft law discussed in legal
scholarship, it proposes a way of structuring the regulatory landscape on AI and of
addressing the question of what is included in the “soft law of AI” today. By adopting a
building-blocks approach (combining distinct definitional components of soft law), the
paper shows that the state of current soft law on AI depends on which position on
international law one defends. Concretely, the paper firstly offers a complete codebook
for identifying the different types of soft law. Secondly, it applies this codebook as a
proof-of-concept for the research proposal by analyzing 40+ ethical guidelines and by
clustering preliminary results according to the actor enacting the guidelines and the
legally relevant effects they could deploy. Four paradigmatic types of soft law emerge:
statist and international organization soft law, process-oriented soft law,
expertise-oriented soft law, and de facto relevant standards soft law. These results
illustrate the contributions which are to be expected from a law-as-data research
proposal.
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. Belmont 2.0;Advances in Information Quality and Management;2024-04-05