Reciprocal expressions and the Maximal Typicality Hypothesis

Author:

Poortman Eva B.1ORCID,Struiksma Marijn E.1,Kerem Nir2,Friedmann Naama3,Winter Yoad1

Affiliation:

1. Utrecht University, Trans 10, 3512 JK, Utrecht

2. Google Israel Ltd., Yigal Alon 98, Tel Aviv 6789141

3. Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv 69978

Abstract

In two experiments, we study the effects of verb concepts on the interpretation of reciprocal expressions in Dutch and Hebrew. One experiment studies Hebrew to test a previous account, the Strongest Meaning Hypothesis, which suggests that listeners resolve ambiguity in reciprocal sentences using the logically strongest meaning that is consistent with the context. The results challenge this proposal, as participants often adopt a weaker meaning than what the Strongest Meaning Hypothesis expects. We propose that these results reflect the sensitivity of reciprocal quantifiers to verb concepts, which is modelled by a new principle, the Maximal Typicality Hypothesis (MTH). For any given reciprocal sentence, the MTH specifies a core situation: the maximal situation that is also maximally typical for the verb concept. The MTH predicts reciprocal sentences to be maximally acceptable in the core situation and, under certain conditions, in situations that contain it, but substantially less acceptable in other situations. To test this prediction, we conducted a two-part experiment among Dutch speakers: (a) a membership test that ranks typicality preferences with different verbs; (b) a truth-value judgement test with reciprocal sentences containing these verbs. The results show that the typical number of patients per agent varies between verbs, with a significant effect of these preferences on reciprocal quantification: the stronger the verb concept’s bias is for one-patient situations, the weaker is the interpretation of reciprocal sentences containing it. These results support the MTH as a basis for a general theory of reciprocal quantification. 

Publisher

Open Library of the Humanities

Reference23 articles.

1. Reciprocals are definites;Beck, Sigrid;Natural Language Semantics,2001

2. Reciprocal expressions and the concept of reciprocity;Dalrymple, MaryMakoto KanazawaYookyung KimSam MchomboStanley Peters;Linguistics and Philosophy,1998

3. Reciprocals distribute over information states;Dotlačil, Jakub;Journal of Semantics,2013

4. Reciprocity and plurality;Heim, IreneHoward LasnikRobert May;Linguistic Inquiry,1991

5. Typicality effects and the logic of reciprocity;Kerem, NirNaama FriedmannYoad WinterEd CormanySatoshi ItoDavid Lutz;Proceedings of Semantics and Linguistic Theory (SALT),2009

Cited by 5 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Groups versus covers revisited: Structured pluralities and symmetric readings;Natural Language Semantics;2021-05-18

2. The lexical and formal semantics of distributivity;Glossa: a journal of general linguistics;2021-03-24

3. Reciprocity: Anaphora, scope, and quantification;Semantics and Pragmatics;2020-09-01

4. The NP-strategy for Expressing Reciprocity;Typological Studies in Language;2020-02-17

5. Symmetric predicates and the semantics of reciprocal alternations;Semantics and Pragmatics;2018-02-09

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3