Affiliation:
1. University of Tübingen, Nauklerstraße 35, 72074 Tübingen
2. University of Tübingen, Wilhelmstraße 50, 72074 Tübingen
Abstract
Frey (2000; 2004) assumes that German is discourse-configurational regarding aboutness topics, namely that there is a special syntactic position for topics within the German middle field, directly above the base position of sentence adverbials. In this paper we will present two acceptability judgment studies and two reading time studies that provide support for a designated topic position in German. Based on assumptions regarding (non-)topicable noun phrases, i.e. phrases that are (not) able to serve as an aboutness topic (see e.g. Frey 2004; Endriss 2009), we manipulated the subject type (referential, quantified, non-referential) and the position of the subject (preceding and following a sentence adverbial). In a further experiment, we varied whether the referential subject is marked as a topic or not. In sum, we found convincing evidence for a syntactic topic position. We do not think that our results affirm the assumption of a TopP (topic phrase), but they at least suggest the existence of a topic position in a descriptive sense.
Publisher
Open Library of the Humanities
Reference35 articles.
1. Syntaktische Funktions-Ambiguitäten im Deutschen;Bader
Markus
Meng
Michael
Bayer
Joseph
Hopf
Jens-Max;Zeitschrift für Sprachwissenschaft,2000
2. Quantificational Topics
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献