Grammatical versus lexical words in theory and aphasia: Integrating linguistics and neurolinguistics

Author:

Boye Kasper1,Bastiaanse Roelien2

Affiliation:

1. University of Copenhagen, Emil Holms Kanal 2, 2300 Copenhagen S

2. University of Groningen, PO Box 716, 9700 AS Groningen, NL; and Higher School of Economics, Moscow

Abstract

The distinction between grammatical and lexical words is standardly dealt with in terms of a semantic distinction between function and content words or in terms of distributional distinctions between closed and open classes. This paper argues that such distinctions fall short in several respects, and that the grammar-lexicon distinction applies even within the same word class. The argument is based on a recent functional and usage-based theory of the grammar-lexicon distinction (Boye & Harder 2012) and on the assumption that aphasic speech data represent the ideal testing ground for theories and claims about this contrast. A theoretically-based distinction between grammatical and lexical instances of Dutch modal verb forms and the verb form hebben was confronted with agrammatic and fluent aphasic speech. A dissociation between the two aphasia types was predicted and confirmed. 

Publisher

Open Library of the Humanities

Subject

Linguistics and Language,Language and Linguistics

Reference51 articles.

1. Characteristics of Swahili-English bilingual agrammatic spontaneous speech and the consequences for understanding agrammatic aphasia;Abuom, Tom O.Roelien Bastiaanse;Journal of Neurolinguistics,2012

2. The retrieval and inflection of verbs in the spontaneous speech of fluent aphasic speakers;Bastiaanse, Roelien;Journal of Neurolinguistics,2011

3. Why reference to the past is difficult for agrammatic speakers;Bastiaanse, Roelien;Clinical Linguistics and Phonetics,2013

4. Linguistic complexity and frequency in agrammatic speech production;Bastiaanse, RoelienGosse BoumaWendy Post;Brain and Language,2009

5. The role of frequency in the retrieval of nouns and verbs;Bastiaanse, RoelienMartijn WielingNienke Wolthuis;Aphasiology,2016

Cited by 23 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3