Approximation derived from a scalar exclusive particle associating with covert focus: The case of Hebrew be-sax ha-kol

Author:

Orenstein Dina1,Greenberg Yael1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Bar Ilan University, Ramat Gan

Abstract

We propose a unifying analysis of two readings – exclusive and approximative – of the Hebrew particle be-sax ha-kol, arguing that under both the particle is a scalar focus sensitive exclusive, expressing a positive and a negative inference, i.e. the truth of its prejacent and the exclusion of stronger focus alternatives, respectively. The difference between the readings is argued to derive from a minimal difference in the overtness vs. covertness of the focus associate of be-sax ha-kol: Whereas the exclusive reading is standardly derived by associating the particle with overt and prosodically marked material, the approximative reading results from its association with the covert pos modifier of gradable expressions, resulting in an “x is pos A, but not maximally A” inference.We show that this approximative reading is only licensed when the scale associated with the gradable expression is upper-bound, but the standard of comparison is not necessarily maximal, pace Kennedy & McNally (2005), and compare it with the effects of true approximators (like more or less). We also observe that relative to only and to the exclusive reading of be-sax ha-kol, the at-issueness status of the positive and negative components in the approximative reading is reversed, being at-issue vs. not-at-issue, respectively. We discuss this observation in light of claims about the mirror imaged status of components of only vs. p-exh in Bassi et al. (2019), and in light of theories arguing for the gradience of at-issueness status and its sensitivity to information structure (e.g. Abrusán 2011; Tonhauser et al. 2018).

Publisher

Open Library of the Humanities

Subject

Linguistics and Language,Language and Linguistics

Reference62 articles.

1. Presupposition triggering from alternatives;Abusch, Dorit;Journal of Semantics,2010

2. Predicting the presuppositions of soft triggers;Abrusán, Márta;Linguistics & Philosophy,2011

3. Experimental evidence on the distinction between foregrounded and backgrounded meaning;Amaral, PatríciaChris CumminsNapoleon KatsosGregory Kierstead,2011

4. Alxatib, Sam. 2013. ‘Only’ and association with negative antonyms. Cambridge, MA: MIT dissertation.

5. Approximating the limit: The interaction between quasi ‘almost’ and some temporal connectives in Italian;Amaral, PatricialFabio Del Prete;Linguistics and Philosophy,2010

Cited by 3 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3