Affiliation:
1. University of Maryland, Department of Linguistics, 1401 Marie Mount Hall, College Park, MD 20742
Abstract
This paper reviews some developmental psycholinguistic literature on quantifier scope. I demonstrate how scope has been used as a valuable probe into children’s grammatical representations, the nature of children’s on-line understanding mechanisms, and the role that experience plays in language acquisition. First, children’s interpretations of certain scopally ambiguous sentences reveals that their syntactic representations are hierarchical, with the c-command relation playing a fundamental role in explaining interpretive biases. Second, children’s scope errors are explained by incremental parsing and interpretation mechanisms, paired with difficulty revising initial interpretations. Third, a priming manipulation reveals that children’s clauses, like those of adults, are represented with predicate-internal subjects. Finally, data on scope variation in Korean reveals that in the absence of disambiguating evidence, parameter setting is an essentially random process. Together, these discoveries reveal how the developmental psycholinguistics of scope has proved a valuable tool for probing issues of grammar, parsing and learning.
Publisher
Open Library of the Humanities
Subject
Linguistics and Language,Language and Linguistics
Reference37 articles.
1. The Acquisition of Syntactic Knowledge
2. Conroy, Anastasia. 2008. The role of verification strategies in semantic ambiguity resolution in children and adults. College Park, MD: University of Maryland dissertation.
3. Surface scope as a default: The effect of time in resolving quantifier scope ambiguity;Conroy, AnastasiaScott FultsJulien MusolinoJeffrey Lidz,2008
4. Quantification without qualification;Crain, StephenRosalind ThorntonCarole BosterLaura ConwayDiane Lillo-MartinElaine Woodams;Language Acquisition,1996
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献