A Cross-Sectional Survey of Fixed-Dose Combination Antihypertensive Medicine Prescribing in Twenty-Four Countries, Including Qualitative Insights

Author:

O’Hagan EdelORCID,McIntyre DanielORCID,Nguyen TuORCID,Tan Kit MunORCID,Hanlon PeterORCID,Siddiqui Maha,Anastase DzudieORCID,Lim Toon WeiORCID,Uzendu AneziORCID,Van Nguyen TanORCID,Wong Wei JinORCID,Khor Hui MinORCID,Kumar Pramod,Usherwood TimothyORCID,Chow Clara K.ORCID

Abstract

Background: Treatment inertia, non-adherence and non-persistence to medical treatment contribute to poor blood pressure (BP) control worldwide. Fixed dose combination (FDC) antihypertensive medicines simplify prescribing patterns and improve adherence. The aim of this study was to identify factors associated with prescribing FDC antihypertensive medicines and to understand if these factors differ among doctors worldwide. Methods: A cross-sectional survey was conducted online from June 2023 to January 2024 to recruit doctors. We collaborated with an international network of researchers and clinicians identified through institutional connections. A passive snowballing recruitment strategy was employed, where network members forwarded the survey link to their clinical colleagues. The survey instrument, developed through a literature review, interviews with academic and clinical researchers, and pilot testing, assessed participants perspectives on prescribing FDC antihypertensive medicines for hypertension. Participants rated their level of agreement (5-point Likert scale) with statements representing six barriers and four facilitators to FDC use. Findings: Data from 191 surveys were available for analysis. 25% (n = 47) of participants worked in high-income countries, 38% (n = 73) in upper-middle income, 25% (n = 48) in lower-middle income, 6% (n = 10) in low-income countries. Forty percent (n = 70) of participants were between 36–45 years of age; two thirds were male. Cost was reported as a barrier to prescribing FDC antihypertensive medicines [51% (n = 87) agreeing or strongly agreeing], followed by doctors’ confidence in BP measured in clinic [40%, (n = 70)], access [37%, (n = 67)], appointment duration [35%, (n = 61)], concerns about side-effects [(21%, n = 37)], and non-adherence [12%, (n = 21)]. Facilitators to FDC antihypertensive polypills prescribing were clinician facing, such as access to educational supports [79%, (n = 143)], more BP measurement data [67%, (n = 120)], a clinical nudge in health records [61%, (n = 109)] and patient-facing including improved patient health literacy [49%, (n = 88)]. The levels of agreement and strong agreement across all barriers and facilitators were similar for participants working in higher or lower income countries. Across all countries, participants rated FDC antihypertensive medications highly valuable for managing patients with non-adherence, (82% reported high or very high value), for patients with high pill burden (80%). Interpretation: Cost and access were the most common barriers to prescribing FDCs across high- and low-income countries. While greater educational support for clinicians was perceived as the leading potential facilitator of FDC use, this seems unlikely to be effective without addressing access.

Publisher

Ubiquity Press, Ltd.

Reference65 articles.

1. The global epidemiology of hypertension;Nat Rev Nephrol,2020

2. Worldwide trends in hypertension prevalence and progress in treatment and control from 1990 to 2019: a pooled analysis of 1201 population-representative studies with 104 million participants;The Lancet,2021

3. Prevalence, awareness, treatment, and control of hypertension in rural and urban communities in high-, middle-, and low-income countries;JAMA,2013

4. Schutte A, Srinivasapura Venkateshmurthy N, Mohan S, Prabakaran D. Hypertension in low- and middle-income countries [Internet]. [cited 2022 Nov 14]. Available from: https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/epub/10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.120.318729.

5. Antihypertensive treatment in a general uncontrolled hypertensive population in Belgium and Luxembourg in primary care: therapeutic inertia and treatment simplification. The SIMPLIFY study;PLoS ONE,2021

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3