Struggles and Joys: A Mixed Methods Study of the Artefacts and Reflections in Medical Student Portfolios

Author:

McDonald JennyORCID,Hu WendyORCID,Heeneman SylviaORCID

Abstract

Introduction Portfolios scaffold reflection on experience so students can plan their learning. To elicit reflection, learning experiences documented in portfolios must be meaningful. To understand what experiences first- and second-year medical students find meaningful, we studied the patterns in the artefacts chosen for portfolios and their associated written reflections. Methods This explanatory mixed methods study of a longitudinal dataset of 835 artefacts from 37 medical student’ portfolios, identified patterns in artefact types over time. Mixed-model logistic regression analysis identified time, student and curriculum factors associated with inclusion of the most common types of artefacts.  Thematic analysis of participants’ reflections about their artefacts provided insight into their choices.  Interpretation of the integrated findings was informed by Transformative Learning (TL) theory. Results Artefact choices changed over time, influenced by curriculum changes and personal factors.  In first year, the most common types of artefacts were Problem Based Learning mechanism diagrams and group photos representing classwork; in second year, written assignments and ‘selfies’ representing social and clinical activities.  Themes in the written reflections were Landmarks and Progress, Struggles and Strategies, Connection and Collaboration, and Joyful Memories for Balance.  Coursework artefacts and photographic self-portraits represented all levels of transformative learning. Conclusions Medical students chose artefacts to represent challenging and/or landmark experiences, balanced by experiences that were joyful or fostered peer connection. Novelty influenced choice. To maximise learning students should draw from all experiences, to promote supported reflection with an advisor. Tasks should be timed to coincide with the introduction of new challenges.

Publisher

Ubiquity Press, Ltd.

Subject

Education

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3