Abstract
Introduction: There is a requirement for health and care systems and services to work on an equitable basis with people who use and provide integrated care. In response, co-production has become essential in the design and transformation of services. Globally, an array of approaches have been implemented to achieve this. This unique review explores multi-context and multi-method examples of co-production in integrated care using an exceptional combination of methods.
Aim: To review and synthesise evidence that examines how co-production with service users, unpaid carers and members of staff can affect the design and transformation of integrated care services.
Methods: Systematic review using meta-ethnography with input from a patient and public involvement (PPI) co-production advisory group. Meta-ethnography can generate theories by interpreting patterns between studies set in different contexts. Nine academic and four grey literature databases were searched for publications between 2012–2022. Data were extracted, analysed, translated and interpreted using the seven phases of meta-ethnography and PPI.
Findings: A total of 2,097 studies were identified. 10 met the inclusion criteria. Studies demonstrated a variety of integrated care provisions for diverse populations. Co-production was most successful through person-centred design, innovative planning, and collaboration. Key impacts on service transformation were structural changes, accessibility, and acceptability of service delivery. The methods applied organically drew out new interpretations, namely a novel cyclic framework for application within integrated care.
Conclusion: Effective co-production requires a process with a well-defined focus. Implementing co-delivery, with peer support, facilitates service user involvement to be embedded at a higher level on the ‘ladder of co-production’. An additional step on the ladder is proposed; a cyclic co-delivery framework. This innovative and operational development has potential to enable better-sustained person-centred integrated care services.
Reference78 articles.
1. Donaldson L. Exploring patient participation in reducing health-care-related safety risks. Copenhagen: World Health Organisation; 2013. https://iris.who.int/bitstream/handle/10665/326442/9789289002943-eng.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y.
2. Citizens as active participants in integrated care: Challenging the field’s dominant paradigms;International Journal of Integrated Care,2019
3. European Commission. Co-production – enhancing the role of citizens in governance and service delivery. European Social Fund Plus; 2018. https://ec.europa.eu/european-social-fund-plus/en/publications/co-production-enhancing-role-citizens-governance-and-service-delivery.
4. World Health Organisation. WHO global strategy on people-centred and integrated health services: interim report. 2015; WHO/HIS/SDS/2015.6. https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/155002/WHO_HIS_SDS_2015.6_eng.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y.
5. Department of Health. Care and support statutory guidance. Issued under the Care Act 2014; 2014. https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/315993/Care-Act-Guidance.pdf.
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献