Abstract
Clinical reasoning is an essential expertise of health care professionals that includes the complex cognitive processes that lead to diagnosis and management decisions. In order to optimally teach, learn, and assess clinical reasoning, it is imperative for teachers and learners to have a shared understanding of the language. Currently, educators use the terms schema and framework interchangeably but they are distinct concepts. In this paper, we offer definitions for schema and framework and use the high-stakes field of aviation to demonstrate the interplay of these concepts. We offer examples of framework and schema in the medical education field and discuss how a clear understanding of these concepts allows for greater intentionality when teaching and assessing clinical reasoning.
Reference69 articles.
1. Abraham Flexner and his remarkable report on medical education: a century later;JAMA,2010
2. Committee on Diagnostic Error in Health Care; Board on Health Care Services; Institute of Medicine; The National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. The Path to Improve Diagnosis and Reduce Diagnostic Error. In: Balogh EP, Miller BT, Ball JR, (eds.), Improving Diagnosis in Healthcare [e-book]. National Academies Press (US); 2015 [cited 2022 Nov 7]: 355–401. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK338589/.
3. Teaching the Diagnostic Process as a Model to Improve Medical Education;Acad Med,2017
4. Teaching clinical reasoning to medical students;Clin Teach,2013
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献