Increasing wild boar density explains the decline of a Montagu’s harrier population on a protected coastal wetland
-
Published:2021-07-19
Issue:
Volume:
Page:229-239
-
ISSN:2014-928X
-
Container-title:Animal Biodiversity and Conservation
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Anim. Biodiv. Conserv.
Author:
Crespo J.1, Jiménez J.2, Martínez–Abraín A.3ORCID
Affiliation:
1. Centro de Recuperación de Fauna Salvaje 'La Granja', El Saler, Valencia, Spain 2. Servicio de Vida Silvestre, VAlencia, Spain 3. Universidade da Coruña, A Coruña, Spain
Abstract
We studied the rapid decline in the number of breeding pairs (geometric growth rate λ = 0.86; 14 % annual decrease) of a semi–colonial ground–nesting bird of prey, the Montagu’s harrier (Circus pygargus), after twelve years of rapid population growth (λ = 1.15; 15 % rate of annual increase) in a protected coastal wetland in Eastern Spain. The study was conducted from 1992–2017, and the range of values in population size was: 2–37 breeding pairs. We contrasted 20 biologically–sound hypotheses (including local and regional factors) to explain the trend over time in the annual number of pairs. The most parsimonious model included a surrogate of wild boar (Sus scrofa) density in the region during the previous year and the annual number of Montagu’s harrier pairs breeding inland in the study province during the focal year. Syntopic western marsh harriers (C. aeruginosus) were not found to have any effect on the numbers of Montagu’s harriers either in our modelling or when we performed a quantitative and qualitative study both for years t and t–1. Our final ‘best’ models did not include spring rainfall, regional forest fires or local land use changes. The impact of wild boars on breeding success, together with conspecific attraction, could have resulted in the dispersal of coastal wetland birds to larger populations in dense inland shrub lands where levels of wild boar nest predation were more likely lower
Publisher
Consorci del Museu de Ciencies Naturals de Barcelona
Subject
Nature and Landscape Conservation,Animal Science and Zoology
Reference69 articles.
1. Acevedo, P., Farfán, M. A., Márquez, A. L., Delibes–Mateos, M., Real, R., Vargas, J. M., 2011. Past, present and future of wild ungulates in relation to changes in land use. Landscape Ecology, 26: 19–31. 2. Acevedo, P., Quirós–Fernández. F., Casal, J., Vicente, J., 2014. Spatial distribution of wild boar population abundance: basic information for spatial epidemiology and wildlife management. Ecological Indicators, 36: 594–600. 3. Apollonio, M., Anderson, R., Putman, R., 2010. European ungulates and their management in the 21st century. Cambridge University Press, New 4. Arroyo, B., García, J., 2005. Aguilucho cenizo, Circus pygargus. In: Libro Rojo de las Aves de España: 138–141 (A. Madroño, C. González, J. C. Atienza, Eds.) Dirección General para la Biodiversidad–SEO/BirdLife, Madrid. 5. – 2007. El aguilucho cenizo y el aguilucho pálido en España. Población en 2006 y método de censo. SEO/BirdLife, Madrid.
|
|