Affiliation:
1. ULUDAĞ ÜNİVERSİTESİ, ZİRAAT FAKÜLTESİ
2. BURSA ULUDAG UNIVERSITY
3. BURSA ULUDAG UNIVERSITY, FACULTY OF AGRICULTURE
4. Bursa Uludağ Üniversitesi
Abstract
Sowing dates and harvest stages are very important to obtained better forage yield and quality. The goal of the study was to ascertain how the quinoa growing conditions in Marmara will be affected by the sowing dates and harvest stages. In 2018 and 2019, the experiment was conducted in an experimental field in the Agricultural Application and Research Area of Bursa Uludag University's Agriculture Faculty. The field experiment was set up using three replicates of a split-plot randomized complete blocks design. Titicaca variety of quinoa was used as a plant material in the study. Four different sowing dates (15 April, 1 May, 15 May and 1 June) were considered in the main plot and three different harvest stages (beginning of flowering, full flowering and seed setting) in the sub-plot. In this study, plant height, dry matter yield, crude protein, crude protein yield, neutral detergent fiber, acid detergent fiber, the relative feed value, and macro and micro elements were examined. The two-year findings show that sowing on May 1 produced the maximum dry matter yield (2798 kg ha-1) and crude protein yield (584 kg ha-1). In terms of harvest stages, seed setting stage came to the fore in terms of high forage (4001 kg ha-1) and crude protein yield (746 kg ha-1).
Funder
BURSA ULUDAĞ ÜNİVERSİTESİ BAPB
Publisher
Turkish Journal of Field Crops
Subject
Agronomy and Crop Science
Reference35 articles.
1. AOAC International. 1997. Official methods of analysis of
AOAC international, 16th ed., 3rd rev. Method 955.04. The
Association, Gaithersburg, MD.
2. Bazile, D., D. Bertero and C. Nieto. 2015. State of the art report
on kinoa around the world in 2013, Oficina Regional De La
Fao Para América Latina Y El Caribe, 250-266
3. Bertero, H.D., R.W. Kingand and A.J. Hall. 2000. Photoperiod and temperature effects on the rate of leaf appearance in quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa). Australian Journal of Plant Physiology 27: 349–356.
4. Bhargava, A., S. Shukla and D. Ohri. 2007. Genetic variability
and interrelationship among various morphological and
quality traits in quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.). Field
Crops Research 101: 104-116.
5. FAO 1994. Plant production and protection series. In J. E.
Hernandez and J. Leon (Eds.), Neglected Crops 1492 from a
Different Perspective. No. 26, Available at
http://www.fao.org/docrep/T0646E/T0646E00.htm (Access
date: March 01, 2021).