Abstract
Open Science as the foundation of transparent and reproducible science is increasingly being incorporated into curricula. We argue that Open Science education is predestined not to be taught in classical lectures, but to be experienced first-hand as reproduction studies in student projects. The case study of a successful Master’s module is presented from three perspectives: the lecturers’, the students’ and the researchers’ whose published study was reproduced. This illustrates that attempting to reproduce a published study is a very vivid and sustainable learning experience that naturally incorporates many Open Science topics, and that the students’ work contributes to increasing the number of reproduced studies and ensuring the quality of the published body of scientific knowledge.
Publisher
Staats- und Universitatsbibliothek Hamburg Carl von Ossietzky
Reference20 articles.
1. ARIYO, Adebiyi A., ADEWUMI, Adewumi O. and AYO, Charles K., 2014. Stock Price Prediction Using the ARIMA Model. UKSim-AMSS 16th International Conference on Computer Modelling and Simulation, Cambridge, UK, 2014, pp. 106-112, DOI: 10.1109/UKSim.2014.67.
2. BAKER, Monya, 2016. 1,500 scientists lift the lid on reproducibility. Nature. 25 May 2016. 533(7604), pp.452–454. Available from: DOI: 10.1038/533452a.
3. BESANÇON, Lonni, PEIFFER-SMADJA, Nathan, SEGALAS, Corentin, JIANG, Haiting, MASUZZO, Paola, SMOUT, Cooper, BILLY, Eric, DEFORET, Maxime and LEYRAT, Clémence, 2021. Open science saves lives: lessons from the COVID-19 pandemic. BMC Medical Research Methodology. December 2021. Vol. 21, no. 1, p. 117. DOI: 10.1186/s12874-021-01304-y.
4. BLOOM, Benjamin S.; Krathwohl, David R. and BERTRAM, Masia B., 1956. Taxonomy of educational objectives: The classification of educational goals. Handbook I: Cognitive domain. New York: David McKay Company.
5. BOOTH, Andrew, SUTTON, Anthea and PAPAIOANNOU, Diana, 2016. Systematic approaches to a successful literature review. Second edition. Los Angeles: Sage. ISBN 978-1-4739-1245-8.