Admitting Geriatric Hip Fracture Patients to the Orthopaedic Service Decreases Cost of Care

Author:

Zelenski Nicole A.1ORCID,Brock John Logan2ORCID,DeAngelis Ryan D.2ORCID,Charette Ryan S.2ORCID,Neuwirth Alexander L.3ORCID,Mehta Samir2ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Emory University

2. Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania

3. Colombia University

Abstract

Introduction Hip fractures are common and costly, costing $12 billion annually in the US. A large portion of the cost of care is related to inpatient care, which is highly variable. There is a lack of strong evidence regarding whether medicine or orthopaedics should serve as the primary admitting and managing service in the care of hip fracture patients with neither having improved outcomes. The purpose of this study is to compare the cost of care between patients who were admitted to orthopaedic vs. non-orthopaedic services after geriatric hip fractures. Methods A retrospective chart review was conducted of patients over the age of 55 with hip fractures undergoing operative treatment at a Level 1 trauma center between 2010-2013. We examined demographic information, admitting service (orthopaedic vs. non-orthopaedic), length of stay, ASA score as well as reimbursement and cost information. Statistical analysis was performed to evaluate what factors most influence cost of care. Results A total of 326 patients with hip fractures were included in the analysis. After controlling for age, sex, BMI, and ASA score, admission to the orthopaedic service was associated with $3,172 lower total costs than admission to a non-orthopaedic service (p=0.0001). Patients admitted to the orthopaedic service were discharged an average of 2.6 days earlier than patients on the non-orthopaedic service (p<0.0001). There was no difference in 30-day readmission or 90-day mortality between the two groups. Discussion Hip fracture patients admitted to the orthopaedic service are discharged sooner than patients admitted to a non-orthopaedic service, even when controlling for ASA score. Nationally, this implies substantial potential cost savings from admitting patients to orthopaedic rather than non-orthopaedic services. Systems should develop clear guidelines on when it is appropriate to admit hip fracture patients to non-orthopaedic services, and the orthopaedic service should be the default admitting service.

Publisher

Charter Services New York d/b/a Journal of Orthopaedic Experience and Innovation

Reference28 articles.

1. Patient variables which may predict length of stay and hospital costs in elderly patients with hip fracture;Anna E. Garcia;Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma,2012

2. Patient factors associated with increased acute care costs of hip fractures: A detailed analysis of 402 patients;R. Aigner;Archives of Osteoporosis,2016

3. Continuous geriatric care in Orthopaedic wards: A valuable alternative to orthogeriatric units;R. Antonelli Incalzi;Aging (Milano),1993

4. Critical path analysis for the management of fractured neck of femur;Graham Tallis;Australian Journal of Public Health,2010

5. Clinical pathway for fractured neck of femur: A prospective, controlled study;Peter F M Choong;Medical Journal of Australia,2000

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3