Affiliation:
1. Virtua Health System
2. Lowell General Hospital
3. Agility Center Orthopedics
4. Inspira Health System
Abstract
Reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) has been the gold standard for complete rupture for nearly 40 years. During this journey, variations on technique, rehab, and graft selection have been points of discussion. With the explosion of biologic augments currently seen in orthopedics, a paradigm shift of reconstruction to potential repair and/or restoration has begun. The bridge enhanced ACL restoration (BEAR) procedure provides the ability to perform primary repair of the acutely torn ACL’s via utilization of a proprietary protein based scaffold. Many promising benefits have been shown from early clinical data, including potentially decreasing risk of osteoarthritis, decreased donor site morbidity, and higher success rates in the subset of patients that fail ACL restoration verses those that fail ACL reconstruction. Nevertheless, restoration has potential drawbacks and requires proper patient identification. As the implant has moved from research to commercialization, many questions still exist regarding why, how, and when to use the BEAR implant for injured patients. This manuscript aims to provide a broad overview of these questions and provide clarity based upon initial experiences.
Publisher
Charter Services New York d/b/a Journal of Orthopaedic Experience and Innovation
Reference26 articles.
1. Function, osteoarthritis and activity after ACL-rupture: 11 years follow-up results of conservative versus reconstructive treatment;M. A. Kessler;Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy,2008
2. Use of a Bioactive Scaffold to Stimulate Anterior Cruciate Ligament Healing Also Minimizes Posttraumatic Osteoarthritis After Surgery;Martha M. Murray;The American Journal of Sports Medicine,2013
3. Factors affecting donor-site morbidity after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using bone-patellar tendon-bone autografts;J. Kartus;Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy,1997
4. Graft site morbidity with autogenous semitendinosus and gracilis tendons;Kazunori Yasuda;The American Journal of Sports Medicine,1995
5. Saphenous neuralgia after arthroscopically assisted anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with a semitendinosus and gracilis tendon graft;Christoph Bertram;Arthroscopy,2000