The Stabilized Lachman’s Test: A Highly Sensitive, Specific and Accurate Test to Diagnose Acute ACL Tears

Author:

Wetzler Austin1,Ruzzi Sara2,Keller Rachel2,Patel Aakash2,Chaudhry Yash2,Wetzler Merrick23

Affiliation:

1. Lewis Katz School of Medicine, Temple University

2. Philadelphia College of Osteopathic Medicine

3. Virtua Health

Abstract

Background The Lachman’s Test (LT) is the one of the most relied tests for the clinical diagnosis of a torn Anterior Cruciate Ligament (ACL). The accuracy of the traditional LT is largely dependent on the skill and experience of the observer as well as the timing of the knee was examined in respect to the injury. Wroble & Linderfeld first described the stabilized Lachman’s Test (SLT) in 1988. The examiner’s thigh is placed underneath and supports the thigh while the examiner’s hand (the opposite one to the extremity being examined) is used to stabilize the thigh. Purpose The purpose of this study was to prospectively analyze the sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of the SLT to diagnose acute ACL tears. The hypothesis is that the SLT is a very sensitive, specific, and accurate test to diagnose ACL deficiency in acutely injured knees. Methods Two hundred patients with acute knee injuries were prospectively studied. All were examined within 30 days of injury (average – 8.3 days). Any patients with a previous ipsilateral or contralateral ligament knee injury were excluded from this study. All knees were examined prior to examining or interviewing the patient. There were 83 (41.5%) females and 117 (58.5%) males with an average age of 27.3 years. The SLT results were not graded but recorded as a positive or negative result. ACL tears were definitively diagnosed with MRI. Results On the initial examination there were 46 (23%) patients that had SLT that was recorded as positive and 154 (77%) that were considered negative. Forty-eight patients (24%) had a torn ACL and in 152 (76%) knees, the ACL was found to be intact by MRI. The SLT produced 44 (22%) true positives and 150 (75%) true negatives as well as 4 (2%) false negatives and 2 (1%) false positives. The resulting sensitivity was 91.7%, specificity was 98.7% and accuracy was 97%. The positive predictive value was 95.7% with the negative predictive value of 97.0%. The positive likelihood ratio was 69.9 and the negative likelihood ration was 0.085 Discussion The SLT is a highly sensitive, specific and accurate test for diagnosing ACL tears in the knee. The advantage of the SLT is that it allows the patient to relax the leg easily because the thigh is resting on a stable object. The examiner will feel the lower extremity relax by increased pressure on their own thigh and as soon as they feel this the SLT is performed. The examiner’s hand can now easily stabilize the thigh and control the leg’s rotation even in patients with large thighs or with clinicians with smaller hands, thus increasing the reliability and reproducibility of the SLT. Conclusion The SLT is highly sensitive, specific and accurate and has advantages over the standard LT. The SLT is a valuable tool in the armament of the clinician’s physical exam and diagnostic testing. It is beneficial for clinicians to at least try and compare it to the standard LT, especially those with less clinical experience.

Publisher

Charter Services New York d/b/a Journal of Orthopaedic Experience and Innovation

Reference19 articles.

1. Clinical Examination in the Diagnosis of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injury: A Blinded, Cross-sectional Evaluation;R.L. Kulwin;JAAOS: Global Research and Reviews,2023

2. The Reliability of Physical Examination Tests for the Diagnosis of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Rupture--A Systematic Review;T. Lange;Man Ther,2015

3. Diagnostic Accuracy of Physical Examination for Anterior Knee Instability: A Systematic Review;M. C. Leblanc;Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc,2015

4. The "Lever Sign": A New Clinical Test for the Diagnosis of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Rupture;A. Lelli;Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc,2016

5. Accuracy of Lachhman and Anterior Drawer Tests for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries;H. Makhmalbaf;Arch Bone Jt Surg,2013

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3