Analysis of Patient Comments on Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in Orthopaedic Trauma

Author:

Carlson Tim A.1,Vang Sandy2,Sibley Andrew3,Huspeni Rachel3,Schroder Lisa K.4,Cole Peter A.2,Nguyen Mai2ORCID

Affiliation:

1. University of Wisconsin Hospitals and Clinics

2. Regions Hospital

3. University of Minnesota - Twin Cities

4. University of Minnesota

Abstract

Background Patient-reported outcome measures (PROM) surveys are being increasingly utilized in orthopaedic trauma. However, the current validated outcome tools generally do not permit individualized patient narrative responses. With the implementation of a new electronic PROM program that allowed for additional comments, we sought to determine the comment rate on PROM surveys and to define the most common themes discussed by patients. Methods A prospectively collected orthopaedic trauma registry from a single metropolitan Level I trauma center from January 2018 to April 2020 was retrospectively reviewed for PROM data. Validated general and injury specific PROM surveys were sent to patients electronically at six weeks, three months, six months, one year and two years post-operatively. Patients were able to leave comments following the multiple-choice questions. These comments were categorized into groups based on their content. Results Out of 3068 completed PROM surveys, 1112 (36%) had additional comments. There was no statistically significant difference in age, gender, or PROMIS-10 scores between the group who left comments on completed PROMs and those who did not. A total of nine themes were identified including: positive communication, negative communication, empathy, pain management, positive functional outcome, negative functional outcome, appreciation for care, survey suggestions, and neutral comments. There were more positive comments (57%) than negative comments (35%). Eight percent of the comments had neither a positive nor negative theme. The most common themes were related to interactions with the surgical team and communication (68%). Only 14% of comments were related to functional outcome. Following the dissemination of these findings in our department, we observed a 2.5% increase in satisfaction rating in the proceeding three-month period. Conclusions More than one-third of the patients that completed PROM surveys provided additional comments regarding their care. Analysis of patient narrative responses provides valuable information to improve patient-centered, value-based care.

Publisher

Charter Services New York d/b/a Journal of Orthopaedic Experience and Innovation

Reference28 articles.

1. Patients' Perspectives of Care and Surgical Outcomes in Michigan;Kyle H. Sheetz;Annals of Surgery,2014

2. The cost of satisfaction: A national study of patient satisfaction, healthcare utilization, expenditures, and mortality;Joshua J. Fenton;Archives of Internal Medicine,2012

3. Measuring patient satisfaction in orthopaedic surgery;Brent Graham;Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery,2015

4. The value of patients’ handwritten comments on HCAHPS surveys;J.W. Huppertz;J Healthc Manag,2014

5. Electronic capture of patient-reported and clinician-reported outcome measures in an elective orthopaedic setting: A retrospective cohort analysis;Karan Malhotra;BMJ Open,2016

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3