Affiliation:
1. Department of Natural Sciences, Northwest Missouri State University, Maryville, Missouri, USA
Abstract
Abstract
The widespread decline in amphibian populations highlights the need for establishing rigorous monitoring methods for long-term population studies. In an attempt to launch a long-term monitoring study for a Gray Treefrog complex (Hyla versicolor LeConte /chrysoscelis Cope, hereafter treefrog) population in northwest Missouri, I tested the use of PVC pipe traps in a system of ponds and inlets along a lakeside habitat for three years. For each pond (3) and inlet (2), I established an array of 16 pipes so as to compare differences in use between pipe location, ponds and inlets, and sex ratio between sites. Pipes were checked twice a week during the summer for the presence of treefrogs. Treefrog usage of pipes between ponds and inlets were compared using a contingency table analysis, while an ANOVA was used to assess differences in sex ratios between sites (α = 0.05). A single inlet was used by treefrogs more heavily than the other ponds or inlet (G = 13.61, df = 3, P = 0.0035), however, I found no differences in terms of pipe location within a pond or inlet. Mean sex ratio between water bodies varied but did not significantly differ. There appears to be little effect in terms of pipe placement within our 50 m buffer from the water's edge, but unique habitat effects at sampling locations may significantly affect detection rates or usage.
Publisher
Missouri Academy of Science
Reference23 articles.
1. Biek,
R. W.,
Funk
C.,
Maxell
B. A.,
and
MillsL. S.
2002.
What is missing in amphibian decline research: insights from ecological sensitivity analysis.
Conservation Biology16:
728–
734.
2. Blaustein,
A. R.,
Romansic
J. M.,
Kiesecker
J. M.,
and
HatchA. C.
2003.
Ultraviolet radiation, toxic chemicals and amphibian population declines.
Diversity and Distributions9:
123–
140.
3. Boughton,
R. J.,
Staiger
J.,
and
FranzR.
2000.
Use of PVC pipe refugia as a sampling technique for hylid treefrogs.
American Midland Naturalist144:
168–
177.
4. Clemas,
R. J.,
Germano
J. M.,
Speare
R.,
and
BishopP. J.
2009.
Use of three individual marking methods in Australian frogs (Genus: Litoria) with notes on placement of visible implant alphanumeric tags.
New Zealand Natural Sciences34:
1–
7.
5. Feinberg,
S. E.
1970.
The analysis of multidimensional contingency tables.
Ecology51:
419–
433.