Em i tisa blong mi—On the value of community engagement in research
Author:
Matisoo-Smith Elizabeth
Reference19 articles.
1. Acabado, S. 2020. Current archaeological practice in Southeast Asia: Collaboration, engagement, and community involvement in field research in Southeast Asia. Journal of Community Archaeology & Heritage 7(3):158-160. doi.org/10.1080/20518196.2020.1767370.
2. Adams, M.S., J. Carpenter, J.A. Housty, D. Neasloss, P.C. Paquet, C. Service, J. Walkus and C.T. Darimont 2014. Toward increased engagement between academic and indigenous community partners in ecological research. Ecology and Society 19(3):5. doi.org/10.5751/ES-06569-190305.
3. Cann, R.L., M. Stoneking and A.C. Wilson 1987. Mitochondrial DNA and human evolution. Nature 325:31-36. doi.org/10.1038/325031a0.
4. Claw, K.G., M.Z. Anderson, R.L. Begay, K.S. Tsosie, K. Fox and N.A. Garrison 2018. A framework for enhancing ethical genomic research with Indigenous communities. Nature Communications 9(1):2957. doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-05188-3.
5. Cunningham, H. 1998. Colonial encounters in postcolonial contexts-Patenting indigenous DNA and the Human Genome Diversity Project. Critique of Anthropology 18(2):205-233. doi.org/10.1177/0308275X9801800205.