Comparative analysis of labile and stable high-frequency TENS in the treatment of neuropathic pain syndrome

Author:

Al-Zamil M. Kh.1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. , Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia, Chief physician of the Clinic of the Brain and Spine LLC «Olivia», Moscow

Abstract

Introduction: There have been many works devoted to the comparative analysis of high-frequency and low-frequency TENS in the treatment of neuropathic pain syndrome. Meanwhile, the comparative analysis of the methods of labile and stable TENS has not been sufficiently studied to date. Purpose: To make a comparative analysis of labile and stable high-frequency TENS in the treatment of neuropathic pain syndrome in patients with distal polyneuropathy of the lower extremities (DPLE). Materials and methods: 64 patients (F: 34, M: 30) with severe neuropathic pain syndrome on the background of diabetic DPLE were studied. Depending on the method of high-frequency TENS, all patients were divided into 2groups: stable high-frequency TENS (n=31) and labile high-frequency TENS (n=33). TENS was carried out every other day for a month. The severity of pain was determined by the VAS before each procedure. Results: The reduction of pain syndrome with the use of labile stimulation was 76.9%, compared to stable stimulation — 41,6%. With daily registration of pain syndrome, a significant increase in pain syndrome was revealed in patients who underwent stable high-frequency TENS after the 7th procedure to 4,5±0,3points in comparison with the indicators of pain syndrome obtained after the 3rd procedure (3,2±0,14). Conclusions: The analgesic effect of the labile high-frequency TENS significantly exceeds the analgesic effect of the stable high-frequency TENS by 85.1%. Partial tolerance to high-frequency TENS is observed when applying stable stimulation, which develops after the 7th procedure and is not observed after labile TENS.

Publisher

PANORAMA Publishing House

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3