Abstract
In recent years, rehabilitation of cancer patients has received increasing attention in routine practice. Given the diversity of oncological pathology and related therapeutic tactics, various approaches to medical rehabilitation are being actively studied around the world. Oncologists and rehabilitation specialists note the direct impact of these programs on the quality of life of patients, preservation of their functions, adaptation in society, and side effects associated with antitumor treatment. The development, scientific substantiation, and implementation of rehabilitation programs to improve the quality of life of patients, as well as the results of special antitumor therapy are the subject of research and are not part of mandatory standards or clinical In recent years, rehabilitation of cancer patients has received increasing attention in routine practice. Given the diversity of oncological pathology and related therapeutic tactics, various approaches to medical rehabilitation are being actively studied around the world. Oncologists and rehabilitation specialists note the direct impact of these programs on the quality of life of patients, preservation of their functions, adaptation in society, and side effects associated with antitumor treatment. The development, scientific substantiation, and implementation of rehabilitation programs to improve the quality of life of patients, as well as the results of special antitumor therapy are the subject of research and are not part of mandatory standards or clinicalIn recent years, rehabilitation of cancer patients has received increasing attention in routine practice. Given the diversity of oncological pathology and related therapeutic tactics, various approaches to medical rehabilitation are being actively studied around the world. Oncologists and rehabilitation specialists note the direct impact of these programs on the quality of life of patients, preservation of their functions, adaptation in society, and side effects associated with antitumor treatment. The development, scientific substantiation, and implementation of rehabilitation programs to improve the quality of life of patients, as well as the results of special antitumor therapy are the subject of research and are not part of mandatory standards or clinical recommendations for providing care to cancer patients. This paper presents the rehabilitation experience of researchers in clinical oncological practice with gastric cancer patients receiving standard systemic immunotherapy. Conclusion. The research shows that patients with gastric cancer require comprehensive rehabilitation, which includes nutritional support, physical rehabilitation, psychological support, electrolyte control, and physiotherapy. Active analysis and study of comprehensive rehabilitation in gastric cancer may not only help improve understanding of the impact of this approach on treatment outcomes, quality of life and overall well-being of patients, but also contribute to the development of more effective models of integrated care for patients with gastric cancer.
Publisher
PANORAMA Publishing House