Affiliation:
1. P.K. Anokhin Science Research Institute of Normal Physiology, Moscow, Russian Federation
2. Federal State Budgetary Educational Institution of Further Professional Education «Russian Medical Academy of Continuous Professional Education» of the Ministry of Healthcare of the Russian Federation, Moscow, Russia
Abstract
Objective. The study deals the influence of different biofeedback (BFB) depth for support reaction on the performance of a short course (3 sessions) for a motor-cognitive training of static and dynamic types in the rehabilitation of patients after a radical mastectomy.
Subjects and methods. 21 patients between the ages of 40 and 74 years after radical mastectomy for breast cancer (BC) were examined and performed rehabilitation with the BFB depth for support reaction with a change normal sensitiveness of the force platform by 15, 30, 45 and 60 %. The 1st group included aged 40–54 patients, and the 2nd group included aged 57–74 patients.
Results and conclusion. It was found that after 3 courses of the motor-cognitive training of dynamic type (“Lights”), conditionally “younger” patients showed an increase of their results from the fi rst to the third session in all four variants of the changing BFB depth (15, 30, 45, 60 %) from the normal sensitiveness of the force platform. These results weren’t found in dynamics in the 2nd group of patients. Data from static training (“Target”) shows that changing of the BFB depth in the range from 15 to 60 % don’t affect the results of exercises in both groups throughout 3 sessions. These types of training for older patients weren’t as effective as for younger patients over such a short period. Probably, these results of dynamic training depend on multitasking and learning difficulties. The obtained results should be taken into account when a training plan will be drowned up because the incorrect selection of the BFB depth and the short period of medical rehabilitation will reduce the eff ect of training.
Publisher
PANORAMA Publishing House
Reference16 articles.
1. Lahart I.M., Metsios G.S., Nevill A.M., Carmichael A.R. Physical activity for women with breast cancer after adjuvant therapy. Cochrane Database Systematical Review. 2018; 29 (1) https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858. CD011292.pub2.
2. Santos Silva D.S., Tremblay M.S., de Fatima M., de Souza M., Guerra M.R., Mooney M., Naghavi M., Carvalho Malta D. Mortality and years of life lost due to breast cancer attributable to physical inactivity in the Brazilian female population (1990–2015). Plos one. 2018; 24 (7). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal. pone.0190943.
3. Shihkerimov R.K., Savin A.A., Velsher L.Z., Stakhanov M.L., Stulin I.D., Savin L.A., Stragev S.V. The pathology of brachial neuro-vascular bundle in clinical manifestations of postmastectomy syndrome. Vestnik Natsional’nogo mediko-khirurgicheskogo Tsentra im. N.I. Pirogova. VAK. 2011; 6 (4): 86–90. Accessed May 20, 2020. (In Russ.). УДК 616.833.34: 618.19-089.87. https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/ patologiya-plechevogo-sosudisto-nervnogo-puchka-v-klinicheskih-proyavleniyah-postmastektomicheskogo-sindroma.
4. Association of oncologists of Russia, the Russian society of clinical Oncology, Russian society of oncomammology. Clinical recommendations: «Breast cancer». Age group: adults. 2019; 82–83. Accessed May 20, 2020. (In Russ.). https://oncology-association.ru/fi les/new-clinical-guidelines/rak_molochnoj_zhelezy.pdf.
5. Turner R.R., Steed L., Quirk H., Greasley R.U., Saxton J.M., Taylor S.Jc., Derek J.Rosario, Thaha M.A., Bourke L. Interventions for promoting habitual exercise in people living with and beyond cancer. Cochrane Database Systematical Review. 2018; 19 (9). https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD010192.pub3.