Affiliation:
1. Moscow Clinical Hospital 24
Abstract
The review presents data from the analysis of the literature on various options of using negative pressure wound therapy after abdominal-perineal extirpation of the rectum. We have selected 10 scientific papers for analysis, and no randomized trials have been found in the literature. The use of local negative pressure led to an acceleration of tissue repair and a decrease in complications in the perineal wound area. However, at the moment, the data presented in the literature are insufficient for an objective assessment of the effectiveness of the technique. It is necessary to conduct randomized trials to objectively evaluate the methodology.
Publisher
PANORAMA Publishing House
Subject
General Chemical Engineering
Reference32 articles.
1. Kaprin A. D., Starinskiy V. V., Petrova G. V. Cancer in Russia in 2017 (morbidity and mortality). M. MNIOI im P. A. Gercina. Russia 2018; 250. (in Russ.)
2. Arnold M, Sierra M., Laversanne M. et al. Global patterns and trends in colorectal cancer incidence and mortality // Gut. 2017; 66 (4): 683–691. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2015–310912.
3. Marley AR, Nan H. Epidemiology of colorectal cancer // Int. J. Mol. epidemiol. Genet. 2016; 7 (3): 105–114.
4. Foster J. D., Tou S., Curtis, N. J., Smart, N. J., Acheson, A., Maxwell-Armstrong, C., Francis, N. K.. Closure of the perineal defect after abdominoperineal excision for rectal adenocarcinoma — ACPGBI Position Statement // Colorectal Dis. 2018; 20: 5–23. doi:10.1111/codi.14348.
5. Jones H, Moran B, Crane S, Hompes R, Cunningham C. The LOREC APE registry: operative technique, oncological outcome and perineal wound healing after abdominoperineal excision // Colorectal Dis. 2017; 19: 172–80. doi: 10.1111/codi.13423.