Questionnaire as a stratification method in organizing colorectal cancer screening

Author:

,Kulovskaya D. P.ORCID,Shelygin Yu. A.ORCID, ,Frolov S. A.ORCID,

Abstract

The purpose of the study: to compare the efficacy of questionnaires and fecal immunochemical tests in stratification of risk groups during colorectal cancer screening. A non-randomized comparative study was conducted to evaluate the effectiveness of two stratification methods for colorectal cancer screening as part of pilot projects in the regions of the Central Federal District of the Russian Federation. In the first group, the stratification method was the original questionnaire, and in the second group — the fecal immunochemical test (FIT). All participants included in the first and second groups underwent colonoscopy at the second stage of screening. A total of 250 respondents participated in the study, 128 in the questionnaire group and 122 in the FIT group. In the questionnaire group, a high risk of colorectal cancer was found in 91 (71.1 %) individuals, while 37 (28.9 %) respondents had a low risk. Based on colonoscopy results, colorectal cancer and colorectal polyps were diagnosed in 65 (50.8 %) participants, and no significant pathology was found in 63 (49.2 %). In the FIT group, 102 (83.6 %) participants tested positive (FIT+) and 20 (16.4 %) tested negative (FIT-). According to the results of the performed colonoscopy, colorectal cancer and colon polyps were diagnosed in 75 (61.5 %) individuals, while no significant pathology was detected in 47 (38.5 %) participants. The sensitivity of the questionnaire was 86.2 % (95 % CI 75.3–93.5 %) and specificity was 44.4 % (95 % CI 31.9–57.5 %); the predictive value of a positive result was 61.5 % (95 % CI 50.7–71.6 %), and the predictive value of a negative result was 75.7 % (95 % CI 58.8–88.2 %). The FIT sensitivity was 86.7 % (95 % CI 76.8–93.4 %), the specificity was 21.3 % (95 % CI 10.7–35.7 %), the predictive value of a positive result was 63.7 % (95 % CI 53.6–73.0 %), and the predictive value of a negative result was 50.0 % (95 % CI 27.2–72.8 %). In conclusion, the questionnaire method in the colorectal cancer screening model is comparable in sensitivity and specificity to those of the FIT. It is essential to emphasize that questionnaires, along with ease of implementation, do not entail significant economic costs.

Publisher

PANORAMA Publishing House

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3