Abstract
The purpose of the study: to investigate the quality of life of patients with inguinal hernias after Lichtenstein’s surgery using the implants with a tissue-gripping system and conduct a comparative assessment of this technique and the results of classical laparoscopic surgery. The prospective controlled clinical study included the results of follow-up of 99 patients with inguinal hernias. The first group included the patients who underwent LHR surgery of the inguinal canal using a composite self-fixing polypropylene mesh. In the patients of the second group, LHR was performed using a composite polypropylene mesh, which was fixed with polypropylene suture material. The third group consisted of the patients operated on using the technique of laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal surgery. Indicators of physical and psychological health components were studied in the patients using the SF-36 questionnaire in the preoperative period and 3, 6, and 12 months after surgery. Results: The patients with inguinal hernias in the long-term postoperative period had different periods of restoration of quality of life, which were determined by the type of surgical intervention and the type of fixation of the synthetic implant. Three months after surgery, significant signs of normalization of indicators of the physical health component were recorded only in groups of the patients after LHR using self-fixing implants and TAPP. In the patients with suture fixation of implants during LHR, the first signs of restoration of the physical component of health, comparable to self-fixing meshes, were observed 6 months after surgery. Changes in indicators of the psychological health component in the patients of the LHR and TAPP groups did not differ at all study intervals. Conclusion: The use of implants with a tissue-gripping system when performing LHR leads to optimization and reduction of physical rehabilitation in patients with inguinal hernias, which makes it possible to recommend the use of self-fixing meshes for open repair in cases of relative and absolute contraindications to TAPP.
Publisher
PANORAMA Publishing House
Reference29 articles.
1. 1. Botezatu A. A., Paskalov Iu. S. Sovremennye metody khirurgicheskogo lecheniia pakhovykh gryzh (obzor literatury) [Modern methods of surgical treatment of inguinal hernias (literature review)]. Vestnik pridnestrovskogo universiteta [Bulletin of the Pridnestrovian University]. Series: Biomedical and Chemical Sciences. 2020; 2 (65): 3-12. (In Russ.)
2. 2. Hernia Surge Group. International guidelines for groin hernia management. Hernia. 2018; 22 (1): 1-165. doi: 10.1007/s10029-017-1668-x
3. 3. Köckerling F, Simons MP. Current Concepts of Inguinal Hernia Repair. Visc Med. 2018; 34 (2): 145-150. doi: 10.1159/000487278
4. 4. Lesnikov S. M., Pavlenko V.V., Podoluzhnyi V. I., Postnikov D. G., Startsev A. B., Shabalina O.V., Bolotkov K. S., Oorzhak O.V. Sovremennaia kontseptsiia geneza i lecheniia gryzh pakhovoi oblasti (obzor literatury) [The modern concept of genesis and treatment of groin hernias (literature review)]. Voprosy rekonstruktivnoi i plasticheskoi khirurgii [Issues of Reconstructive and Plastic Surgery]. 2019; 1 (68): 61-73. doi: 10.17223/1814147/68/11. (In Russ.)
5. 5. Mikhin I.V., Poliakov A. A., Kosivtsov O. A., Riaskov L. A. Endovideokhirurgiia i laparoskopiia - novyi vitok evoliutsii operativnogo lecheniia pakhovykh gryzh [Endoscopic surgery and laparoscopy are new insights of evolution of inguinal hernia repair]. Khirurgiia. Zhurnal im. N. I. Pirogova [Pirogov Russian Journal of Surgery]. 2019; (3): 121-128. doi: 10.17116/hirurgia2019031121. (In Russ.)