Abstract
40 patients with grade 2 and 3 rectocele were included in the study. The long-term results of surgical treatment within a timeframe of 12–42 months after surgery were evaluated in 34 (85 %) patients. The average duration of the disease history amounted to 5 (0.7–19) years. The mean age of the patients was 53.1±10.3 (Me=54.5) years. Before the surgery, as well as 6 and 12 months after the surgery, all patients underwent radiological defecography and were interviewed by means of specialized questionnaires to determine the disorders of the evacuation function of the colon and comprehensively assess the symptomatology of pelvic organ prolapse. Late postoperative complications were revealed in 2 out of 35 (5.7 %) patients 6 months after the surgical intervention. Twelve months after surgery and over, 31 out of 34 (91 %) patients had good or satisfactory outcomes characterized by a significant decrease in the manifestations of obstructed defecation syndrome, confirmed by the results of defecography, which showed an improvement in all criteria of the rectal evacuation function evaluation. These data objectively confirm the effectiveness of this method of treatment. The comparative analysis of the results of the patient survey by means of specialized questionnaires demonstrated a statistically significant difference between the level of scores before the intervention and 12 months after rectovaginal septum repair with W-shaped mesh implant. In conclusion, the method of rectovaginal septum repair with W-shaped mesh implant demonstrated its high efficiency, including the evaluation in the long-term follow-up period.
Publisher
PANORAMA Publishing House
Reference12 articles.
1. 1. Shelygin Iu.A., Titov A. Iu., Dzhanaev Iu.A. et al. Osobennosti klinicheskoi kartiny i kharakter neiro-funktsionalnykh narushenii u bolnykh rektotsele [Peculiarities of clinical presentation and neuro-functional disturbances in patients with rectocele]. Koloproktologiia [Coloproctology]. 2012;1 (42):27-32. (In Russ.)
2. 2. Savoye-Collet C., Savoye G., Koning E., et al. Defecography in symptomatic older women living at home. Age Ageing. 2003;32 (3):347-50. DOI: 10.1093/ageing/32.3.347
3. 3. Swift S., Woodman P., O'Boyle A., et al. Pelvic Organ Support Study (POSST): The distribution, clinical definition, and epidemiologic condition of pelvic organ support defects. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2005;192 (3):795-806. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2004.10.602
4. 4. Grimes C. L., Schimpf M.O., Wieslander C.K., et al. Surgical interventions for posterior compartment prolapse and obstructed defecation symptoms: a systematic review with clinical practice recommendations. Int Urogynecol J. 2019;30 (9):1433- 1454. DOI: 10.1007/s00192-019-04001-z
5. 5. Mathur P., Ng K.H., Seow-Choen F. Stapled mucosectomy for rectocele repair: a preliminary report. Dis Colon Rectum. 2004;47 (11):1978-80; DOI: 10.1007/s10350-004-0670-4