Affiliation:
1. Department of Neurosurgery, Kyrgyz State Medical Academy named after I.K. Akhunbaev
Abstract
The purpose of the research: to improve the results of neurosurgical treatment in patients with traumatic brain injury by detecting an optimal way of craniotomy. Material and methods. The study includes the analysis of 127 patients operated on in the Department of Neurosurgery. The examination sample consisted of 109 (85.8%) male and 18 (14.2%) female patients. Patients’ ages varied from 16 to 85 years. The average age of the patients was 43.8 ± 4.2 years. Results. Not depending on craniotomy method, there was not a statistically significant difference in outcome in patients with traumatic brain injury. Using of trephination, craniectomy and osteoplastic craniotomy revealed no significant differences in outcomes in patients with traumatic brain injury. Patients’ age over 60 years, consciousness degree 4-6 scores according to Glasgow Coma Scale, and dislocation syndrome are unfavorable prognostic factors. Resection craniotomy in traumatic brain injury may be effective even in deep coma consciousness level and dislocation syndrome, but in absence of intraoperative brain edema. Conclusion. During the planning of craniotomy method in traumatic brain injury, 4-9 score consciousness degree according to Glasgow Coma Scale, brain contusion foci, acute subdural and intracerebral hematomas, brain compression volume of 30-150 cm³, patient’ age and dislocation syndrome should be considered, which, in total, predicts an outcome.
Publisher
PANORAMA Publishing House
Reference9 articles.
1. Mamytov M. M. Faktory differentsirovannogo podkhoda v lechenii tiazhelykh ochagovykh povrezhdenii golovnogo mozga [Factors of a differentiated approach in the treatment of severe focal lesions of the brain] [Text] /M. М. Mamytov, K. B. Yrysov, E. M. Mamytova // Likarska sprava, 2012. — No. 6. — P. 68–73. (In Russ.)
2. Potapov A. A. Sovremennye podkhody k izucheniiu i lecheniiu cherepno-mozgovoi travmy [Modern approaches to the study and treatment of traumatic brain injury] [Text] / A. A. Potapov, V. N. Kornienko, L. B. Likhterman, A. D. Kravchuk // [Annals of Clinical and Experimental Neurology]. –2010. — Volume 4. — No. 1 — P. 4–12. (In Russ.)
3. Bullock M. R. Surgical management of acute subdural hematomas [Text] / M. R. Bullock, R. Chesnut, J. Ghajar // Neurosurgery, 2011. — Vol. 58, № 3. — P. 16–24.
4. Ydyrysov I. T. Oslozhneniia v posleoperatsionnom periode pri sochetannoi cherepno-mozgovoi travme [Complications in the postoperative period with combined traumatic brain injury] [Text] / I. T. Ydyrysov, K. B. Yrysov // Sinergiia [Synergy], 2017. — No. 5. — P. 80–87. (In Russ.)
5. Ignatieva N. S. Cherepno-mozgovaia travma: fazy vosstanovleniia kontakta s soboi i mirom i ekzistentsialnoanaliticheskaia rabota [Traumatic brain injury: phases of restoring contact with oneself and the world and existentialanalytical work] [Text] / N. S. Ignatieva // Voprosy neirokhirurgii [Questions of neurosurgery]. — No. 1, 2014. — S. 83–90. (In Russ.)