The role of surgical treatment of recurrent glioblastomas

Author:

,Martynov R. S.ORCID,Martynov B. V.ORCID, ,Babichev K. N.ORCID, ,Chemodakova K. A.ORCID, ,Klimenkova E. Yu.ORCID, ,Alekseeva N. P., ,Svistov D. V.ORCID,

Abstract

Introduction. With standard treatment of glioblastoma, the vast majority of cases result in relapse of the disease, for which there is no consensus on the effectiveness of repeat resection. The lack of Level 1 evidence on the efficacy of surgical removal of recurrent glioblastomas (GB) indicates that the problem has not been resolved and stimulates interest in finding ways to combat this disease. Purpose. To study the effect of surgical treatment of a recurrent tumor on the overall life expectancy and post-relapse survival time of patients with glioblastomas. Materials and methods. The analysis was performed on data from 116 patients: 43 (37.1 %) women and 73 (62.9 %) men. The mean age at the time of diagnosis (primary surgery) was 52±12 full years. Surgical interventions were performed between 1999 and 2017. The study group included 50 patients who underwent GB resection. The control group consisted of 66 patients who were not operated on for GB. To achieve group homogeneity for all studied variables, the pseudo-randomization method was used. Statistical analysis was performed using the program SPSS Statistics 26.0. Results. The median overall life expectancy after GB resection was 23.6 [95 % CI=18.1–29.1] months, in the control group — 21.0 [95 % CI=12.8–29.2] months. The fatal outcome for the patients in the study group was simultaneously influenced by two characteristics: the duration of the relapse-free period (p=0.003) and the volume of the recurrent tumor (p=0.050). For the patients in the control group, only the duration of the relapse-free period (p <0.001) was impactful. The median post-relapse survival time was higher in those patients who underwent resection of 95 % or more of the GB volume than in those without surgery: 10.33 months [95 % CI 9.67 — NA months] and 6.33 months [95 % CI 5.07–11.2 months] (p<0.05), respectively. The 2‑year survival rate in the group after resection of 95 % or more of the GB volume is more than twice as high as in the non-operated group: 38.5 % and 13.7 %, respectively. Conclusions. Maximum reduction in GB volume appears to be advisable, especially in patients with a long relapse- free period when the formation is localized in the subdominant hemisphere of the brain, without spreading to the corpus callosum. Microsurgical removal of recurrent glioblastomas is an effective method of treating patients in comparison with conservative therapy.

Publisher

PANORAMA Publishing House

Reference35 articles.

1. 1. Ostrom Q. T, Patil N, Cioffi G, et al. CBTRUS Statistical Report: Primary Brain and Other Central Nervous System Tumors Diagnosed in the United States in 2013‑2017 // Neuro-Oncol. 2020. Vol. 22 No. 12, Suppl 2 P. 1‑96. DOI:10.1093/neuonc/noaa200

2. 2. Absaliamova O.V., Anikeeva O. Iu., Golanov A.V., et al. Pervichnye opukholi tsentralnoi nervnoi sistemy: (klinicheskie rekomendatsii) [Primary tumors of the central nervous system: (clinical recommendations)]. Published online 2019. Retrieved 04/07/2023. Available at: https://minzdrav.gov-murman.ru/documents/poryadki-okazaniya-meditsinskoy-pomoshchi/Первичные%20опухоли%20 центральной%20нервной%20системы. pdf. (In Russ.)

3. 3. McBain C, Lawrie T.A., Rogozińska E., et al. Treatment options for progression or recurrence of glioblastoma: a network meta-analysis // Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021. Vol. 5 No. 1 P. 36‑45. DOI:10.1002/14651858. CD013579. pub2

4. 4. Kobiakov G. L., Smolin A.V., Bekiashev A.Kh., et al. Lechenie retsidiva glioblastomy: est li uspekhi? [Treatment of recurrent glioblastoma: is there any success?] // Opukholi golovy i shei [Tumors of the Head and Neck]. 2014. No. 3. P. 12‑21. (In Russ.)

5. 5. Ammirati M, Galicich J.H., Arbit E, Liao Y. Reoperation in the treatment of recurrent intracranial malignant gliomas // Neurosurgery. 1987. Vol. 21. No. 5 P. 607‑614. DOI:10.1227/00006123‑198711000‑00001

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3