Abstract
The aim of the work was to study the influence of the locus of control on students’ emotional state and motivation to achieve success. Methods: The study involved 127 students (66 girls and 61 boys) of the 1st year of study at the Medical and Pediatric Faculties of the Saratov State Medical University named after V. I. Razumovsky. The following research methods were used: the questionnaire on the level of subjective control (LSC), T. Ehlers’ questionnaire for studying the motivation to achieve success, test questionnaire «Determining the level of self-esteem» by S. V. Kovalev, and the diagnosing methodology for self-assessment of mental states according to H. Eysenck. Results: The indicator «General Internality Scale» (Questionnaire on the level of subjective control) positively correlates with the indicator «Motivation» by T. Ehlers’ method (0.61) and negatively — with «Self-assessment» of the test-questionnaire by S. V. Kovalev (–0.96), as well as with the indicators of H. Eysenck's methodology: «Aggressiveness» (–0.96), «Anxiety» (–0.97), «Frustration» (–0.90), and «Rigidity» (–0.88). The data obtained confirm the presence of a strong relationship between the studied parameters. Indeed, internality determines the behavior of the individual, being a kind of internal control mechanism for the successful achievement of goals.
Publisher
PANORAMA Publishing House
Reference10 articles.
1. 1. Sovereign G., Walker B. R. (2020). Mind, body and wellbeing: Reinforcement sensitivity theory and self-cultivation systems as wellbeing influencers. Journal of Happiness Studies, 22(1), 1-20. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-019-00216-5
2. 2. Tokareva, V.B. Lokus kontrolia kak metakognitivnyi protsess professionalnoi deiatelnosti subiekta [Locus of control as a metacognitive process of the subject's professional activity] / V.B. Tokareva // Vestnik Iaroslavskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta im. P.G. Demidova [Bulletin of the Yaroslavl State University named after P.G. Demidov]. Series Humanities.2020; 1 (51):134-138. (In Russ.)
3. 3. Antoshkina E.A. Lokus kontrolia i ego vliianie na trudovuiu deiatelnost [Locus of control and its impact on labor activity] // Novoe v psikhologo-pedagogicheskikh issledovaniiakh [New in Psychological and Pedagogical Research]. 2021; 1 (61):39-46. (In Russ.)
4. 4. Antoshkina E.A., Filonova O.S. Vzaimosviaz lokusa kontrolia s drugimi kharakteristikami lichnosti [The relationship of the locus of control with other personality characteristics] // Collection of articles of the III International Scientific and Practical Conference "Science and Modern Education: Topical Issues, Achievements and Innovations". Penza: Science and Education.2021; 1:83-85. (In Russ.)
5. 5. Dağ İ., Şen G. (2018). The mediating role of perceived social support in the relationships between general causality orientations and locus of control with psychopathological symptoms. Europe's Journal of Psychology, 14(3), 531-553. https://doi.org/10.5964/ejop.v14i3.1563