Affiliation:
1. Saint Petersburg State University, Chief Legal Adviser of Gazprom Teploenergo JSC
Abstract
The article examines the problems arising from the lack of a unified conceptual apparatus at the supranational level of the EU on the example of the absence of properly fixed signs of the status of an employee, as well as signs that allow qualifying an employment relationship. The article describes the changed practice of the Court of Justice of the EU on the issue of the extension of guarantees and rights of an employee to various persons. The problems of multilevel regulation of labor relations are fully considered, taking into account a different approach to qualify labor relations in different member states and in the EU itself.
English version of the article is available at URL: https://panor.ru/articles/the-concept-of-employee-in-eu-labor-law/74819.html
Publisher
PANORAMA Publishing House
Reference10 articles.
1. Case 66/85 Deborah Lawrie-Blum v Land Baden-Württemberg [1986] ECLI:EU:C:1986:284.
2. Case C-256/01 Debra Allonby v Accrington & Rossendale College, Education Lecturing Services, trading as Protocol Professional and Secretary of State for Education and Employment [2004] ECLI:EU:C:2004:18.
3. Case C-232/09 Dita Danosa v LKB Līzings SIA [2010] ECLI:EU:C:2010:674.
4. Case C-428/09 Union syndicale Solidaires Isère v Premier Fenoll ministre and Others [2010] ECLI:EU:C:2010:612.
5. Case C-316/13 Gérard v Centre d'aide par le travail “La Jouvene” and Association de parents et d'amis de personnes handicapées mentales (APEI) d'Avignon [2015] ECLI:EU:C:2015:200.