Influence of intraoral conditions on the accuracy of digital and conventional implant impression techniques for two-implant-supported fixed dental prostheses-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Influence of intraoral conditions on the accuracy of digital and conventional implant impression techniques for two-implant-supported fixed dental prostheses

Published:2023 Issue:4 Volume:67 Page:633-640
ISSN:1883-1958
Container-title:Journal of Prosthodontic Research
language:en
Short-container-title:J Prosthodont Res

Author:

Ma Yun¹,Guo Yong-qing²,Jiang Lei¹,Yu Hao¹

Affiliation:

1. Fujian Key Laboratory of Oral Diseases & Fujian Provincial Engineering Research Center of Oral Biomaterial & Stomatological Key Laboratory of Fujian College and University, School and Hospital of Stomatology, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China

2. Department of Prosthodontics & Research Center of Dental Esthetics and Biomechanics, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China

Publisher

Japan Prosthodontic Society

Subject

Dentistry (miscellaneous),Oral Surgery

Link

https://www.jstage.jst.go.jp/article/jpr/67/4/67_JPR_D_22_00242/_pdf

Reference54 articles.

1. [1] Katsoulis J,Takeichi T,Sol Gaviria A,Peter L,Katsoulis K. Misfit of implant prostheses and its impact on clinical outcomes. Definition, assessment and a systematic review of the literature. Eur J Oral Implantology. 2017;10(suppl 1):121–38. PMID:28944373

2. [2] Moreira AHJ,Rodrigues NF,Pinho ACM,Fonseca JC,Vilaça JL. Accuracy Comparison of Implant Impression Techniques: A Systematic Review. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2015;17(suppl 2):e751–64. https://doi.org/10.1111/cid.12310 PMID:25828851

3. [3] Flügge T,Meer WJ,Gonzalez BG,Vach K,Wismeijer D,Wang P. The accuracy of different dental impression techniques for implant‐supported dental prostheses: A systematic review and meta‐analysis. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2018;29(suppl 16):374–92. https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.13273 PMID:30328182

4. [4] Papaspyridakos P,Vazouras K,Chen Y,Kotina E,Natto Z,Kang K,et al. Digital vs Conventional Implant Impressions: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis. J Prosthodont. 2020;29:660–78. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopr.13211 PMID:32613641

5. [5] Kim JH,Kim KR,Kim S. Critical appraisal of implant impression accuracies: A systematic review. J Prosthet Dent. 2015;114:185–192.e1. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2015.02.005 PMID:25935089

Cited by 12 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Intraoral scanners in implant prosthodontics. A narrative review;Journal of Dentistry;2024-09

2. The Accuracy of Digital Impressions versus Conventional Impressions in Neonates with Cleft Lip and/or Palate: A Laboratory-Based Study;Children;2024-07-06

3. Comparative analyses of time efficiency and cost in fabricating fixed implant-supported prostheses in digital, hybrid, and conventional workflows: A systematic review and meta-analysis;The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry;2024-07

4. Comparison between Conventional and Digital Impressions for Determining Axes and Distances of Three Implants in Straight and Curved Lines: An In Vitro Study;Journal of Clinical Medicine;2024-04-18

5. Accuracy of conventional impressions and digital scans for implant-supported fixed prostheses in maxillary free-ended partial edentulism: An in vitro study;Journal of Dentistry;2024-04