Nomenclature Section of XIX International Botanical Congress (July 17–21, Shenzhen, People’s Republic of China): activity and principal decisions-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Nomenclature Section of XIX International Botanical Congress (July 17–21, Shenzhen, People’s Republic of China): activity and principal decisions

Published:2017 Issue: Volume:48 Page:5-12
ISSN:2687-1564
Container-title:Novitates Systematicae Plantarum Vascularium
language:ru
Short-container-title:Novitates Systematicae Plantarum Vascularium

Author:

Geltman D. V.¹

Affiliation:

1. Komarov Botanical Institute of the Russian Academy of Sciences

Abstract

Nomenclature Section of XIX International Botanical Congress (Shenzhen, People’s Republic of China) worked during July 17–21. 155 delegates from 29 countries participated in this section; they have also 427 institutional votes. Of 397 proposals to amend International code of nomenclature for algae, fungi and plants 113 ones (28.5%) were accepted as such or with amendments. The paper contains brief characteristics of the activity of the Nomenclature Section and the review of its principal decisions which in comparison with those adopted by previous, XVIII International Botanical Congress (Melbourne) look conservative enough.

Publisher

Komarov Botanical Institute of the Russian Academy of Sciences

Subject

Insect Science,Ecology,Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

Reference23 articles.

1. Barkworth M. E., Watson M., Barrie F. R., Belyaeva I. V., Chung R. C. K., Daškova J., Davidse G., Donmez A. A., Doweld A. B., Dressler S., Flann C., Gandhi K., Geltman D., Glen H. F., Greuter W., Head M. J., Jahn R., Janarthanam M. K., Katinas L., Kirk P. M., Klazenga N., Kusber W., Kvaček J., Malecot V., Mann D. G., Marhold K., Nagamasu H., Nicolson N., Paton A., Patterson D. J., Price M. J., Prud’homme van Reine W. F., Schneider C. W., Sennikov A., Smith G. F., Stevens P. F., Yang Z.-L., Zhang X.-C., Zuccarello G. C. 2016. (276–279) Proposals to provide for registration of new names and nomenclatural acts // Taxon. Vol. 65, № 3. P. 656–658. https://doi.org/10.12705/653.37

2. Brickell C. D., Alexander C., Cubey J. J., David J. C., Hoffman M. H. A., Leslie A. C., Malecot V., Xiaobai Jin (eds.). 2016. International code of nomenclature for cultivated plants. Ed. 9 // Scripta Horticulture. № 18. P. i–xvii+1–190.

3. Brummitt R. K. 1991. Lists of current use: criteria for inclusion// Improving the stability of names: needs and options. Proceedings of an international symposium, Kew, 20–23 February 1991. Konigstein: Koeltz Scientifi c Books. P. 217–223 (Regnum Vegetabile, vol. 123).

4. Funk V. A., Turland N. J. 2016. Institutional votes at the XIX International Botanical Congress, Shenzhen, 2017: Report of the Special committee on institutional votes // Taxon. Vol. 65, № 6. P. 1449–1454. https://doi.org/10.12705/656.33

5. Geltman D. V., Sokolova I. V. 2013. Botanical nomenclature: specifics and modern tendencies of development // Biological systematics: modern problems. St. Petersburg: KMK Scientific Press. P. 230–238. (Trudy Zoologicheskogo Instututa RAN, Pril. № 2) [In Russian with English abstract] (Гельтман Д. В., Соколова И. В. Ботаническая номенклатура: специфика и современные тенденции развития // Современные проблемы биологической систематики. СПб.: Товарищество научных изданий КМК, 2013. С. 230–238. (Тр. Зоол. ин-та РАН, прил. 2).