Pattern of litterfall production and nutrient addition in soil through litterfall by different tree species: A review
-
Published:2023-12-15
Issue:1
Volume:25
Page:257-266
-
ISSN:2278-5124
-
Container-title:Environment Conservation Journal
-
language:
-
Short-container-title:ECJ
Author:
Pankaj ,Bhardwaj Krishan Kumar,Yadav Rajni,Goyal Vishal,Sharma Manoj Kumar
Abstract
Innutrient dynamics, an extremely valuable resource is litterfall. It is crucial to the dynamics of soil nutrients, the characteristics of soil, and the transfer of energy. In an agroforestry system, decomposition and litter fall are the two key processes that contribute to soil enrichment. In addition to affecting soil characteristics and ecology, litter fall in soil has a significant impact on carbon sequestration. The type of tree, the management methods, and the quantity and quality of litter all affect how much the soil is enriched. The complicated ecophysiological process of litterfall is influenced by both internal and external variables. Other significant causes of leaf fall include variations in weather and photoperiod as well as internal plant characteristics like age of leaf or potential endogenous rhythams. Nutrients are converted as a result of decomposition of different components of litter, and their release is influenced by the content of the litter, moisture, activity of microbes, C:N, temperature, and other variables. Litterfall therefore contributes to the long-term maintenance of nutrient levels in forest ecosystems and has been a primary research focus for a better understanding of soil fertility, site productivity, and forest services.
Publisher
Action For Sustainable Efficacious Development and Awareness
Reference64 articles.
1. Aravena, J. C., Carmona, M. R., Perez, C. A., & Armesto, J. J. (2002). Changes in tree species richness stand structure and soil properties in a successional chronosequence in northern Chile Island. Revista Chilena de Historia Natural, 75, 339-360. 2. Argao, L. E. O. C., Malhi, Y., Metcalfe, D. B., Silva-Espejo, J. E., Jimenez, E., Navarrete, D., & Asquez, R. (2009). Above- and below-ground net primary productivity across net primary productivity across ten Amazonian forests on contrasting soils. Biogeoscience, 6, 2759–2778. 3. Becker, H., Pabst, J., Mnyonga, J., & Kuzyakov, Y. (2015). Annual litterfall dynamics and nutrient deposition depending on elevation and land use at Mt. Kilimanjaro. Biogeoscience Discussion, 2, 10031-10057. 4. Bhardwaj, K. K., Dhillon, R. S., Godara, A. S., Bangarwa, K. S., Sushil, K., & Sheokand, R. N. (2016). Effect of different spacings of poplar based agroforestry system on soil chemical properties and nutrient status in North-West India. Indian Journal of Ecology, 43(1), 312-317. 5. Bhatti, J. S., & Jassal, R. S. (2015). Long term aboveground litterfall production in boreal jack pine (Pinus banksiana) and black spruce (Picea mariana) stands along the Boreal Forest Transect Case Study in western central Canada. Ecoscience, 21(3–4), 301-314.
|
|