The Problem of the Quality of Work Programs of a Practical Psychologist in Education and Criteria for their Assessment-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

The Problem of the Quality of Work Programs of a Practical Psychologist in Education and Criteria for their Assessment

Published:2019 Issue:4 Volume:16 Page:22-34
ISSN:2658-3100
Container-title:Вестник практической психологии образования
language:
Short-container-title:

Author:

Zabrodin Y.M.¹^ORCID,Pakhalyan V.E.²^ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Moscow State University of Psychology & Education

2. Moscow Service of Psychological aid to the Population (GBU MSPN)

Abstract

The analysis of the problem of assessing the content of teaching materials in the system of the Service of Practical Psychology of Education is given. Attention is drawn to the existing difficulties in determining the main content of the methodology of practical psychology itself. The data of a qualitative analysis of regional programs sent to the “All-Russian competition of the best psychological and pedagogical programs and technologies in the educational environment” in 2018 and 2019 are presented. An authors’ understanding of the essence of practical psychology is proposed, on the basis of which the main criteria for evaluating the programs of work of a teacher-psychologist and the actions necessary to solve the main task of modern psychological science and practice are highlighted — ensuring the quality of work of a practical psychologist.

Publisher

Federal State-Financed Educational Institution of Higher Education Moscow State University of Psychology and Education

Subject

General Medicine

Link

https://psyjournals.ru/journals/bppe/archive/2019_n4/Zabrodin_Pakhalyan.pdf

Reference16 articles.

1. Bratchenko S.L. Mir ekspertizy i ego vozmozhnye koordinaty [World of Expertise and its Possible Coordinates]. In G.N. Prozumentova (eds.). Ekspertiza obrazovatelânykh innovatsii [Examination of Educational Innovations]. Tomsk: Tomskii gosudarstvennyi universitet Publ., 2007, pp. 23â45.

2. Bulatova O.V. Trebovaniya k sostavleniyu psikhokorrektsionnykh programm [Requirements for the Preparation of Psychocorrectional Programs]. Vestnik Yugorskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta [Bulletin of Ugra State University], 2014, no. 1 (32), pp. 18â23.

3. Zabrodin Yu.M., Pakhalâyan V.E. Problemy otsenki sootvetstviya professionalânoi deyatelânosti prakticheskikh psikhologov trebovaniyam vnedryaemykh standartov (eshche raz ob ekspertakh i ekspertize v prakticheskoi psikhologii) [Problems of Assessing the Conformity of the Professional Activities of Practical Psychologists with the Requirements of the Standards Being Introduced (once again about experts and expertise in practical psychology)]. Psikhologo-pedagogicheskie issledovaniya [Psychological and Pedagogical Research], 2018. Vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 21â42. doi: 10.17759/psyedu.2018100203.

4. Ivanchenko G.V. Ekspertnoe soobshchestvo v postsovetskom i zapadnom mire [Expert community in the post-Soviet and Western world]. In G.V. Ivanchenko, D.A. Leont'ev (eds.). Ekspertiza v sovremennom mire: ot znaniya k deyatel'nosti [Expertise in the modern world: from knowledge to activity]. Moscow, 2006. 454 p.

5. Katalog psikhologo-pedagogicheskikh programm i tekhnologii v obrazovatelânoi srede [Catalog of psychological and pedagogical programs and technologies in the educational environment]. Portal psikhologicheskikh izdanii PsyJournals.ru [PsyJournals.ru. Portal of Russian Psychological Publications]. Available at: https://psyjournals.ru/files/98422/ pppt_catalog_2018.pdf (Accessed 02.02.2019).

Cited by 3 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. The All-Russian Congress of Psychological Services in the Education System of the Russian Federation, as a Common Space Uniting Professionals;Bulletin of Practical Psychology of Education;2024-05-17

2. “Achilles Heel” of a Practical Psychologist in the Field of Russian Education;Вестник практической психологии образования;2023-04-07

3. The Quality of Professional Activity and its Product in the Work of a Practical Psychologist: the Problem of Defining Evaluation Concepts, Criteria and Methods;Вестник практической психологии образования;2021