Affiliation:
1. Education at University of Tampere
2. University of Helsinki
Abstract
The article presents central ideas and future challenges of cultural-historical activity theory, focusing specifically on the work of the so-called Helsinki school of activity theory. We first introduce the revolutionary roots of the theory in the works of Marx and Vygotsky, and the evolution of the unit of analysis through different generations of activity theory. We then discuss the foundational role of historicity and dialectics in activity theory. We identify two central epistemological-methodological principles that guide activity-theoretical studies, namely the principle of double stimulation and the principle of ascending from the abstract to the concrete. These principles lead us to emphasize formative interventions as a powerful way to conduct societally impactful activity-theoretical research. We conclude by pointing out some major challenges facing activity theory in the 21st century.
Publisher
Federal State-Financed Educational Institution of Higher Education Moscow State University of Psychology and Education
Subject
Psychology (miscellaneous),Social Psychology,Developmental and Educational Psychology,Cultural Studies,Applied Psychology
Reference72 articles.
1. Adler P.S. The environmental crisis and its capitalist roots: Reading Naomi Klein with Karl Polanyi. Administrative Science Quarterly, 2015. Vol. 60(2), p. 13â25.
2. Adler P.S., Heckscher C.C. (eds.), The firm as a collaborative community. New York: Oxford University Press., 2006. 608 p.
3. Arievitch I.M. Beyond the brain: An agentive activity perspective on mind, development, and learning. New York: Springer, 2017. 288 p.
4. Bang J. Building a new house out of old materials â and with sharpened tools. Culture & Psychology, 2008. Vol. 14(1), pp. 45â55.
5. Blunden A. An interdisciplinary theory of activity. Chicago: Haymarket Books, 2010. 348 p.
Cited by
101 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献