Affiliation:
1. Moscow Centre for Research and Practice in Medical Rehabilitation, Restorative and Sports Medicine of Moscow Healthcare Department
Abstract
<p style="text-align: justify;">The aim of the study is to investigate the psychometric characteristics of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) on a sample of patients with impaired motor functions. HADS was used to examine the current psychoemotional state of 73 women and 27 men aged 62.1±13.7 years who were in the hospital for inpatient rehabilitation for motor function disorders arising from a stroke (n=50) or developing against the background of chronic musculoskeletal disorders (n=50). Independent of the psychologist, a psychiatrist examined the same patients, filling out Hamilton Anxiety and Depression scales. A comparison of the findings led to the conclusion of overdiagnosis with the HADS subscales. At the same time, it is shown that the questionnaire items have satisfactory indices of discriminativeness and internal reliability. The combination of low content and convergent validity of some items of the questionnaire allowed modifying subscales, reducing the number of items without prejudice to psychometric characteristics. By comparing the data obtained with an objective external criterion for the Anxiety (HADS-A) and Depression (HADS-D) subscales, new cutoffs (9 points) were determined for diagnosing the presence or absence of anxiety and depression, which allows to use this version of the test more effectively for screening the current psychoemotional state in patients with impaired motor functions who enter the second stage of medical rehabilitation.</p>
Publisher
Moscow State University of Psychology and Education
Reference30 articles.
1. Anryushchenko A.V., Drobizhev M.Yu., Dobrovol'skii A.V. Sravnitel'naya otsenka shkal CES-D, BDI i HADS(D) v diagnostike depressii v obshchemeditsinskoi praktike [A comparative validation of the scale CES-D, BDI, and HADS(d) in diagnosis of depressive disorders in general practice]. Zhurnal nevrologii i psikhiatrii im. S.S. Korsakova = S. Korsakov Journal of Neurology and Psychiatry, 2003, no. 5, pp. 11–17 (In Russ., abstr. in Engl.).
2. Zinchuk M.S., Kustov G.V., Pashnin E.V. et al. Skrining trevozhnykh i depressivnykh rasstroistv pri epilepsii: sovremennoe sostoyanie problem [Screening for anxiety and depressive disorders in epilepsy: current state of the art]. Rossiiskii psikhiatricheskii zhurnal = Russian Journal of Psychiatry, 2021, no. 3, pp. 87–97. DOI: 10.47877/1560-957Ð¥-2021-10309 (In Russ., abstr. in Engl.).
3. Ayerbe L., Ayis S., Wolfe C.D. et al. Natural history, predictors and outcomes of depression after stroke: systematic review and meta-analysis. British Journal of Psychiatry: The Journal of Mental Science, Vol. 202, no. 1, pp. 14–21. DOI: 10.1192/bjp.bp.111.107664
4. Bjelland I., Dahl A.A., Haug T.T. et al. The validity of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale. An updated literature review. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, Vol. 52 (2), pp. 69–77. DOI: 10.1016/s0022-3999(01)00296-3
5. Brehaut E., Neupane D., Levis B. et al. Depression prevalence using the HADS-D compared to SCID major depression classification: An individual participant data meta-analysis. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, Vol. 139, pp. 110256. DOI: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2020.110256
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献