Misconceptions in Psychology as a Negative Factor in the Formation of Professional Competence of Psychologists

Author:

Ermolova Т.V.1ORCID,Litvinov A.V.1ORCID,Chernova O.E.2ORCID,Guzova A.V.3ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Moscow State University of Psychology and Education

2. Academy of Engineering, RUDN University

3. Moscow State University of Phycology and Education

Abstract

<p style="text-align: justify;">The article analyses the problem of misconceptions, or scientific delusions, in the educational environment in connection with the risks introduced into the learning process. It describes the historical regularity of the paradigm shift of misconceptions in psychology from descriptive to constructive. Examples of research in preparation for a paradigm shift and at the stage of a constructive paradigm are introduced, as well as the latest concepts of psychological misconceptions in science and in the educational psychology. The article discusses the idea of the variety of approaches to the problem of psychological delusions. The review showed that the problem of misconceptions in psychology, despite close attention to it over the years, leaves the impression of being poorly studied. Among many other reasons we can emphasize poorly developed tools for scientific research, in particular, the incompleteness of the list of misconceptions typical for the students under investigation and the imperfection of the dichotomous format of questionnaires aimed at identification of psychological delusions. To date, in addition to the negative impact of psychological myths on the professional training of psychology students, the rigidity of their perception of factual refutations of misconceptions during training and the positive impact of critical thinking on overcoming misconceptions have been reliably revealed. It is necessary to include additional procedures for the evaluation of mythologized ideas about psychological phenomena, including those borrowed from other disciplines in which misconcepts are recorded using computerized assessment, interviews with open-ended types of questions, etc. Their use in other disciplines is recognized as optimal for identifying scientific misconceptions among students.</p>

Publisher

Moscow State University of Psychology and Education

Subject

General Earth and Planetary Sciences,General Engineering,General Environmental Science

Reference32 articles.

1. Gegel' G.V.F. Opyty soznaniya: per. s nem. [Experiences of Consciousness]. Moscow: ACT, 2020. 544 p. (In Russ.).

2. Dorozhkin A.M., Tkachev A.N. Zabluzhdenie kak proyavlenie mifa v nauke [Fallacy as a manifestation of myth in science] [Elektronnyi resurs]. Tsennosti i smysly [Values and meanings], 2016, no. 6, pp. 53—61. URL: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=27545489 (Accessed 27.01.2023). (In Russ.).

3. Kozachenko I.Ya. Oshibka: ponyatie, svoistvo, vidy [Error: concept, property, types] [Elektronnyi resurs]. Obshchestvo i pravo = Society and law, 2019, no. 1(67), pp. 13—18. URL: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=37319140 (Accessed 27.01.2023). (In Russ.).

4. Lilienfeld S.O., Lynn S.J., Ruscio J., Beyerstein B. 50 Great Myths of Popular Psychology: Shattering Widespread Misconceptions about Human Behavior. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons, 2010. 352 p.

5. Bensley D.A., Lilienfeld S.O. Psychological Misconceptions: Recent Scientific Advances and Unresolved Issues. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 2017. Vol. 26, no. 4, pp. 377—382. DOI:10.1177/0963721417699026

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3