Affiliation:
1. Moscow State University of Psychology and Education
2. Moscow State University of Psychology & Education
3. Academy of Engineering, RUDN University
Abstract
<p style="text-align: justify;">Gaslighting is typically viewed as a form of psychological manipulation that makes the victim doubt his or her sense of reality and leads to a loss of agency and mental stability. It was spotted over 60 years ago and has long been the subject of study by psychiatrists. Recently, interest in the phenomenon of gaslighting has grown significantly, becoming the subject of research by scientists of various scientific disciplines, which inevitably leads to the expansion of the meaning of this phenomenon and endowing it with additional properties. Psychology is thought to have contributed to this process through the study of symbolic interactionism, attachment theory, self-verification theory, and shared reality. This article presents the dynamics of the development of this term, defines the main features of this phenomenon, and analyzes the basis on which new approaches to the study of gaslighting in modern international psychology are built. The most common assumption in the latest studies is that gaslighting is possible when standard social-cognitive mechanisms are involved in atypical social situations. Relationships with significant others largely determine people's epistemic needs: close people shape and reflect an individual's self-image and perception of the surrounding reality. It is this special position of loved ones that gives gaslighters leverage over the victim.</p>
Publisher
Moscow State University of Psychology and Education
Reference34 articles.
1. Abramson K. Turning up the Lights on Gaslighting. Philosophical Perspectives, 2014. Vol. 28, pp. 1â30. DOI:10.1111/phpe.12046
2. Ahern K. Institutional Betrayal and Gaslighting. The Journal of Perinatal & Neonatal Nursing, 2018. Vol. 32, no. 1, pp. 59â65. DOI:10.1097/JPN.0000000000000306
3. Barton R., Whitehead J.A. The gas-light phenomenon. The Lancet, 1969. Vol. 293, no. 7608, pp. 1258â1260. DOI:10.1016/S0140-6736(69)92133-3
4. Calef V., Weinshel E.M. Some Clinical Consequences of Introjection: Gaslighting. The Psychoanalytic Quarterly, 1981. Vol. 50, no. 1, pp. 44â66. DOI:10.1080/21674086.1981.11926942
5. Dorpat T.L. Gaslighting, the Double Whammy, Interrogation, and Other Methods of Covert Control in Psychotherapy and Psychoanalysis. Northvale: Jason Aronson Inc., 1996. 278Â p.