Affiliation:
1. Krasnodar University of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of the Russian Federation
2. Associate Professor, Deputy head, Chair of Psychology and Pedagogy
Abstract
<p>The relationship between personal readiness for changes as a psychological state that mobilizes personal resources and self-organization as one of the leading professional competencies of a modern higher education teacher is substantiated. The proposed assumption that readiness for change and self-organization have characteristic interrelations is substantiated. The materials of an empirical study obtained on a sample of teachers from different regions of the Russian Federation aged 30 to 70 years, with teaching experience from 3 to 50 years in the amount of 138 people are presented. The methods “Personal change readiness survey” PCRS (Personal change readiness survey) S. Rolnik, V. Hull, N. Heather, R. Gold (adapted by N.A. Bazhanova, G.L. Bardier); "Technological Readiness Index (TRI)" (A. Parasuraman, K. Colby) adapted by Yu.V. Khlopovsky; questionnaire "Diagnostics of the features of self-organization" (DOS) (A.D. Ishkov); author's questionnaire "Professional competencies of a teacher of higher education" were used. Empirical results indicate a low level of readiness for change and an increased level of self-organization indicators, where the indicator of goal-setting is most pronounced, and the least – correction. Conclusions are drawn about the positive relationship between readiness for change, self-organization and optimism, as well as the inverse correlation of these indicators with the level of discomfort that occurs when using various technical innovations in professional activities. The revealed interrelations of indicators of the studied phenomena allow us to most thoroughly approach the formation of a system of professional competencies of a modern teacher of higher education.</p>
Publisher
Moscow State University of Psychology and Education
Reference35 articles.
1. Avakyan I.B., Vinogradova G.A. Otsenka innovatsionnoy gotovnosti pedagogicheskikh kollektivov vuzov [Assessment of innovative readiness of pedagogical groups of universities]. Psikhologo-pedagogicheskiye issledovaniya = Psychological-Educational Studies, 2020. Vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 16–30. Available at: https://psyjournals.ru/journals/psyedu/archive/2020_n1 (Accessed 20.02.2023). DOI:10.17759/psyedu.2020120102 (In Russ.).
2. Belousova S.S. Psikhologicheskie osobennosti gotovnosti lichnosti pedagogov k izmeneniyam [Psychological features of the readiness of the personality of teachers for changes]. Samorealizatsiya lichnosti v sovremennom mire. Materialy Vserossiiskoi nauchno-prakticheskoi konferentsii c mezhdunarodnym uchastiem [Self-realization of personality in the modern world. Materials of the All-Russian scientific-practical conference with international participation]. Moscow: RUDN, 2018, pp. 25–31. (In Russ.).
3. Brynza I.V. Gotovnost' k izmeneniyam kak psikhologicheskii resurs lichnosti v dostizhenii blagopoluchiya [Readiness for change as a psychological resource of the individual in achieving well-being]. Science and Education a New Dimension. Pedagogy and Psychology, 2015, 3(31), pp. 69–73. (In Russ.).
4. Gordeeva T.O., Sychev O.A., Osin E.N. Diagnostika dispozitsionnogo optimizma, validnost' i nadezhnost' oprosnika TDO-P [Diagnostics of dispositional optimism, validity and reliability of the TDO-P questionnaire]. Zhurnal Vysshei shkoly ekonomiki [Psychology. Journal of the Higher School of Economics], 2021. Vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 34–55. DOI:10.17323/1813-8918-2021-1-34-55 (In Russ.).
5. Grishina N.V. Izmenchivost' lichnosti: teoreticheskii konstrukt i empiricheskaya fenomenologiya [Personality variability: theoretical construct and empirical phenomenology]. Novye psikhologicheskie issledovaniya [New psychological research], 2021. Vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 46–63. (In Russ.).