History of psychological assessment testimony

Author:

Krasavina A.G.1

Affiliation:

1. Moscow State University of Psychology and Education

Abstract

The article presents different points of view on the assessment of witness statements. This review results from a range of issues coming up in the modern practice of a forensic psychologist. One of the recent problems connected to the assessment of witness statements validity, is forensic and psychological expert reports, realized on the basis of not locally approved methods, backed by reliable studies. The article describes different approaches of foreign and national specialists to the issue of credibility of witnesses. Despite the significant amount of works in this field, there are still differences and contradictions in researches regarding the assessment of the quality of witness statements. That is why familiarization with the history of the issue is necessary for its further full and complete examination, as well as for avoiding the incorrect operation with existing results in the modern practice of a psychologist.

Publisher

Federal State-Financed Educational Institution of Higher Education Moscow State University of Psychology and Education

Subject

General Earth and Planetary Sciences,General Environmental Science

Reference33 articles.

1. Arsen'ev V.D. Ispol'zovanie special'nyh znanij pri ustanovlenii fakticheskih obstojatel'stv ugolovnogo dela [Using special knowledge in establishing the circumstances of the criminal case]. Krasnojarsk, 1986. 4 p.

2. Gross G. Rukovodstvo k rassledovaniju prestuplenij [A guide to crime investigation]. In V.V. Romanov, E.V. Romanova (ed.) Juridicheskaja psihologija [Legal psychology]. Moscow: Jurist, 2000. 282 p.

3. Dozorceva E.G., Afanas'eva A.G. Ocenka dostovernosti svidetel'skih pokazanij nesovershennoletnih [Assesment of credibility of witnesses]. Sovremennaja zarubezhnaja psihologija. 2015. Tom 4. No. 3, pp. 47–56

4. Engalychev V.F., Kravcova G.K., Holopova E.N. Sudebnaja psihologicheskaja jekspertiza po vyjavleniju priznakov dostovernosti/nedostovernosti informacii, soobshhaemoj uchastnikami ugolovnogo sudoproizvodstva (po videozapisjam sledstvennyh dejstvij i operativno-razysknyh meroprijatij). Moscow: Jurlitinform, 2016. 328 p.

5. Kantorovich J.A. Psihologija svidetel'skih pokazanij [The psychology of testimony] In V.V. Romanov, E.V. Romanova (ed.) Juridicheskaja psihologija [Legal psychology]. Moscow: Jurist, 2000, pp.370-371

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3