Decision-Making on the Choice of a Way to Respond to Conflict Situations in Persons with Affective Disorders

Author:

Bulygina V.G.1ORCID,Peeva O.2ORCID,Lysenko N.2ORCID

Affiliation:

1. V.P. Serbsky National Medical Research Center of Psychiatry and Narcology of the Ministry of Health of Russian Federation

2. V.P. Serbsky National Medical Research Centre for Psychiatry and Narcology of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation

Abstract

In order to research the relationship between individual psychological characteristics and the decision-making process in the perception of acute conflict situations in persons with affective disorders, an empirical study was conducted. 39 people aged 19 to 55 years (M=24, SD=10.3) were examined, of which 67% were females. The main group consisted of persons with affective disorders (N=11), the comparison group were mentally healthy. The research looked into volitional, intellectual regulation and the choice of the method of reaction after the subjects were presented some video recordings of single and long-term acute conflict situations, as well as neutral situations. The diagnostic complex included: methods of “Verbal-color interference”, “Comparison of similar patterns”, questionnaires “Style of self-regulation of behavior”, “Methods of coping behavior”, “Melbourne Decision-making Questionnaire”, “Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale” (HADS). The stylistic features of decision-making, self-regulation of behavior and ways of coping behavior in persons with affective disorders were highlighted. It was revealed that people with affective disorders tend to make impulsive decisions, prefer avoidance strategies and confrontation in acute conflict situations. Specific changes of volitional and intellectual regulation in persons with affective disorders depending on the presented situation are shown. It was concluded that in persons with affective disorders, the speed of choosing a response method is associated with the stylistic features of decision–making. The rigidity of cognitive style is associated with the stylistic features of self-regulation of behavior and coping behavior.

Publisher

Federal State-Financed Educational Institution of Higher Education Moscow State University of Psychology and Education

Subject

General Earth and Planetary Sciences,General Environmental Science

Reference27 articles.

1. Arutyunova K.R. Psikhofiziologicheskii analiz zakonomernostei aktualizatsii individual’nogo opyta pri moral’noi otsenke deistvii: Avtoref. diss. kand. psikhol. nauk. Moscow: Institut psikhologii Rossiiskoi akademii nauk, 2017. 28 p. (In Russ.).

2. Bardenshtein L.M., Mozhginskiy Yu.B. Patologicheskoe geteroagressivnoe povedenie u podrostkov. Moscow: OOO “Zerkalo M”, 2002. (In Russ.).

3. Grishina N.V. Psikhologiya konflikta. 2 ed. Saint Petersburg: Piter, 2008. 544 p. (In Russ.).

4. Indina T.A. Regulyatorno-lichnostnye mekhanizmy prinyatiya reshenii v chrezvychainykh situatsiyakh [Regulation personality mechanisms of decision making in emergency situations]. Izvestiya Rossiiskogo gosudarstvennogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta im. A.I. Gertsena = Izvestia: Herzen University Journal of Humanities & Sciences, 2010, no. 124, pp. 336–347. (In Russ.).

5. Karabanov A.P. Sovremennye napravleniya issledovaniya affektivnykh mekhanizmov prinyatiya reshenii [Modern trends in the study of affective mechanisms of decision-making]. Vestnik RGGU. Seriya “Psikhologiya. Pedagogika. Obrazovanie” = RSUH / RGGU Bulletin. “Psychology. Pedagogics. Education” Series, 2017, no. 3 (9), pp. 167–182. (In Russ.).

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3