How to build substantive judicial-psychological examination-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

How to build substantive judicial-psychological examination

Published:2017 Issue:1 Volume:7 Page:220-249
ISSN:2222-5196
Container-title:Psychology and Law
language:
Short-container-title:

Author:

Safuanov F.S.¹

Affiliation:

1. Moscow State University of Psychology & Education

Abstract

The methodology of the subject types of forensic examinations with the application of psychological knowledge is analyzed. The history of the formation of subject types of forensic psychological examination and a comprehensive forensic psychological and psychiatric examination is considered. Shows their transformation and expansion under the influence of changes of domestic legislation. Based on the definition of the research subject of a legal expert- psychologist, concluded that the first step of building the subject of a separate judicial review should be the analysis of its legal significance. Discussed options for legal consequences and the role of expert opinion in in making judicial decisions. The second step is expertelligence analysis. It is the allocation of the psychological characteristics of legal rules (legal criteria). The third stage of psychological analysis consists in the correlation of concepts with expert knowledge in scientific psychology. The need of adaptation and transformation of scientific psychological knowledge (as basic science) in forensic psychological expertise (special knowledge of the expert) are shown. Discusses ways of formation of special knowledge of the expert-psychologist and the limits of its competence.

Publisher

Federal State-Financed Educational Institution of Higher Education Moscow State University of Psychology and Education

Subject

General Earth and Planetary Sciences,General Environmental Science

Link

https://psyjournals.ru/files/85441/psyandlaw_2017_1_Safuanov.pdf

Reference30 articles.

1. Ambrumova A.G., Tihonenko V.A. Diagnostika suicidal'nogo povedenija: Metodicheskie rekomendacii [Diagnosis of suicidal behavior. Guidelines]. Moscow, 1980. 55 p.

2. Smirnova S.A., Makushkin E.V., Asnis A.Ya. About illegality determination of the validity of evidence through forensic examination. Information letter [Elektronnyi resurs]. Psikhologiia i pravo [Psychology and Law], 2016. Vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 61â78. doi:10.17759/psylaw.2016060306. (In Russ., Ð°bstr. in Engl.)

3. Affekt: praktika sudebnoj psihologo-psihiatricheskoj jekspertizy. Hrestomatija [Affect: the practice of judicial psychological-psychiatric examination: a reader]/ Avtory-sostaviteli:. F.S. Safuanov, E.V. Makushkin. M.: Genezis, 2013. 312 p.

4. Brutman V.I., Enikolopov S.N., Radionova M.S. Nezhelannaja beremennost' u zhertv seksual'nogo nasilija [Unwanted pregnancy among victims of sexual violence] // Voprosy psihologii [Problems of psychology]. 1995. no. 1. pp.33-40.

5. Vinberg A.I., Malahovskaja N.T. Sudebnaja jekspertologija [Judicial expertology]. Volgograd, 1979. 183 s.

Cited by 13 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Use of Specialized Psychological and Linguistic Knowledge in the Study of Information Materials on Cases of Offenses that Infringe on Public Morality;Theory and Practice of Forensic Science;2023-11-09

2. The role of clinical psychologist in modern healthcare system;National Health Care (Russia);2023-05-18

3. On the Main Terms of the Forensic Psychological Analysis of Information Materials;Theory and Practice of Forensic Science;2022-10-29

4. Methodical Approach to the Analysis of Information Materials Regarding Public Discredit of the Use of the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation;Theory and Practice of Forensic Science;2022-08-12

5. Судебная лингвистическая экспертиза;2022-08-05