The problem of using psychological knowledge in family disputes over children in civil legal proceedings

Author:

Terekhina S.A.1,Oshevsky D.S.2

Affiliation:

1. Federal state budgetary institution «Serbsky Federal medical research Centre of Psychiatry and Narcology» of the Ministry of healthcare of the Russian Federation

2. Moscow State University of Psychology and Education

Abstract

The article is dedicated to the analysis of the problems occurring while using special psychological knowledge in civil legal proceedings of family disputes over children after divorce. Using civil cases and reviews on psychological evaluations done upon lawyers' requests the article shows that a major part of those evaluations is executed on a low professional level, doesn't meet necessary requirements which leads to their unsuitability as bases for making judicial decisions. The article identifies groups of typical mistakes of psychological evaluations of underage persons in the situation of family divorce. It also highlights in detail procedural and institutional, methodological, structural, and deontological mistakes. The articles offers steps to change the practice of using psychological knowledge in civil legal proceedings of protecting child's interests after divorce.

Publisher

Federal State-Financed Educational Institution of Higher Education Moscow State University of Psychology and Education

Subject

General Earth and Planetary Sciences,General Environmental Science

Reference13 articles.

1. Burmenskaya G.V. et al. Vozrastno-psihologicheskij podhod v konsul'tirovanii detej i podrostkov [Age-psychological approach in counseling children and adolescents]. Moscow: Publ. MPSI, 2007. 480 p.

2. Grazhdanskij processual'nyj kodeks Rossijskoj Federacii (red. ot 07.03.2018). [The Civil and Procedure Code of Russian Federation] [Elektronnyj resurs]. URL: http://www.consultant.ru/document/Cons_doc_LAW_39570/ (Accessed 20.05.2018).

3. Zaharov S. Rasprostranennost' razvodov s det'mi [Ellektronnyj resurs] [Prevalence of divorces with children]. Demoskop Weekly. 2013. № 545–546. URL: http://www.demoscope.ru/weekly/2013/0545/tema04.php) (Accessed 20.05.2018).

4. Makushkin E.V. et al. Kompleksnaya sudebnaya psihologo-psihiatricheskaaya ehkspertiza nesovershennoletnih. Metodicheskie rekomendacii [Complex judicial psycho-psychiatric examination of minors]. Moscow: Publ. FGU «GNCSSP Roszdrava», 2011. 28 p.

5. Mohon'ko A.R., Makushkin E.V., Muganceva L.A. Osnovnye pokazateli deyatel'nosti sudebno-psihiatricheskoj ehkspertnoj sluzhby Rossijskoj Federacii v 2015 godu: Analiticheskij obzor [Key performance indicators of the forensic psychiatric expert service of the Russian Federation in 2015: Analytical review]. Moscow:  Publ. FGBU «FMICPN im. V.P. Serbskogo» Minzdrava Rossii, 2016. Vyp. 24. 212 p.

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Typical Mistakes in Forensic Examinations on Disputes Related to Child-Rearing;Theory and Practice of Forensic Science;2020-10-23

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3