Dialogical Self And Psychotherapy-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Dialogical Self And Psychotherapy

Published:2017 Issue:2 Volume:25 Page:144-158
ISSN:2075-3470
Container-title:Консультативная психология и психотерапия
language:
Short-container-title:

Author:

Grebenyuk E.G.¹

Affiliation:

1. Center of Psychological Counseling

Abstract

The wide diversity of psychotherapy methods sometimes brings the need to com- pare them and identify the relationships between them. The dialogical self theory proposed by Hubert Hermans as a bridging theory can be a useful tool for that — although it doesn’t offer fundamentally new ideas, it allows to connect various existing concepts. The article introduces a brief overview of the basic concepts of this theory and practical strategies and methods based on it. Human self is considered a dia- logue between different I-positions. The theory presents a long tradition of dialogue in philosophy and psychology on the one hand and the postmodern view on identity as multiple and changeable on the other. The possibilities and limitations of this model in psychotherapy are considered.

Publisher

Federal State-Financed Educational Institution of Higher Education Moscow State University of Psychology and Education

Subject

Clinical Psychology,Health (social science),Developmental and Educational Psychology

Link

https://psyjournals.ru/files/86467/kpip_2017_n2_Grebenyuk.pdf

Reference29 articles.

1. Grebenyuk E.G. Svidetelâstvovanie v psikhoterapii [Witnessing in psychotherapy]. Konsulâtativnaya psikhologiya i psikhoterapiya [Counseling Psychology and Psycho- therapy], 2015. Vol. 23, no. 3, pp. 93â104. doi:10.17759/cpp.2015230307. (In Russ., Ð°bstr. in Engl.)

2. Sokolova E.T., Burlakova N.S. K obosnovaniyu metoda dialogicheskogo analiza sluchaya [Towards substantiation of dialogic case analysis method]. Voprosy Psik- hologii, 1997, no. 2, pp. 61â75.

3. Sokolova E.T., Chechelânitskaya E.P. Modelirovanie strategii psikhoterapevticheskogo ob- shcheniya pri patologicheskikh vnutrennikh dialogakh [Modeling psychotherapeutic com- munication strategy in case of pathological inner dialogues]. Konsulâtativnaya psikhologiya i psikhoterapiya [Counseling Psychology and Psychotherapy], 2001, no. 1, pp. 102â120.

4. White M. Karty narrativnoi praktiki: per. s angl. [Maps of Narrative Practice]. Mos- cow: Genezis, 2010. 326 p. (In Russ.).

5. Ulanovskii A.M. Chto stoit za strochnym Â«yaÂ»? Kommentarii k statâe G. Kherman- sa [What lies behind lower-case self? Commentary to the paper by H. Hermans] // Postneklassicheskaya psikhologiya. Sotsialânyi konstruktsionizm i narrativnyi podkhod [Postmodern psychology. Social constructivism and narrative approach], 2006â2007, no. 1 (3), pp. 54â55.