Affiliation:
1. Lomonosov Moscow State University
2. Moscow Institute of Psychoanalysis
Abstract
The results of a cross-cultural study of volitional regulation in in representatives of 11 ethno-cultural groups living in the territory of the Russian Federation and the former USSR are presented. The representatives of the Armenian, Bashkir, Byelorussian, Jewish, Mari, Ossetian, Russian, Tajik, Tatar, Ukrainian peoples, as well as the Komi people were compared. The samples were balanced by gender, age and other socio-demographic characteristics. In total, 1156 people took part in the study. To diagnose the individual characteristics of volitional regulation of the respondents, the following methods were used: “Action-control scale” by Yu. Kuhl, “Questionnaire for revealing the expression of self-control in the emotional sphere, activity and behavior”, self-evaluation of volitional qualities. The presence of significant differences between the groups for all measured parameters was shown (p<0.001). The obtained results confirm the hypothesis about the presence of cross-cultural differences in the parameters of volitional regulation and confirm the ideas of the volition as a higher mental function.
Funder
Russian Foundation for Basic Research
Publisher
Federal State-Financed Educational Institution of Higher Education Moscow State University of Psychology and Education
Reference24 articles.
1. Asmolov A.G. Psixologiya lichnosti: principy` obshhepsixologicheskogo analiza [Personality Psychology: Principles of General Psychological Analysis]. Moscow, Smysl Publ., 2001. 414 p. (In Russian).
2. Batyrshina A.R., Mazilov V.A. Naukometricheskii podkhod k issledovaniyu problemy voli v otechestvennoi psikhologii [Scientometric Method in Studying the Problem of Volition and Volitional Regulation in Russian Psychology History]. Yaroslavskii pedagogicheskii vestnik [Yaroslavl Pedagogical Bulletin], 2016, no. 5, pp. 193â204. (In Russian; abstract in English).
3. Baumann N., Kazén M., Quirin M., Koole S.L. Why People Do the Things They Do: Building on Julius Kuhlâs Contributions to the Psychology of Motivation and Volition. Hogrefe Publishing, 2018. 433 p.
4. Baumeister R.F., Vohs K.D. Strength Model of Self-Regulation as Limited Resource: Assessment, Controversies, Update. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 2016, vol. 54, pp. 67â127.
5. Bozhovich L.I. Razvitie voli v ontogeneze [The development volition in ontogenesis]. Problemy formirovaniya lichnosti [Problems of Personality Development]. Moscow, MPSI Publ., Voronezh, NPO âMODEKâ Publ., 2001. pp. 302â332. (In Russian).
Cited by
7 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献