Affiliation:
1. Chelyabinsk State University
2. Universidad Tecnológica Indoamérica
3. St-Petersburg State University
Abstract
Though numerous scholars have studied subjective time, its predictors and effects, the general model considering demographic variables, cultural values and level of wellbeing is not presented. This study seeks to bridge this gap by contributing a comparative study of two very different countries: Ecuador (N=745, aged 19—76, 48.7% male), a Latin American developing country, and Russia (N=428, aged 18—72, 40.2% male), an emerging Eurasian nation. We assumed that temporal focus plays the role of a mediator in the relationship between cultural values and subjective happiness in both countries. To predict the temporal focus (Temporal Focus Scale by Shipp, Edwards, and Lambert, 2009) in both countries, based on the previous literature the study tests the importance of three groups of variables: demographic factors (gender, age, education, income), subjective happiness (Subjective Happiness Scale by Lyubomirsky and Lepper, 1999), and cultural values (Cultural Values Scale by Yoo, Donthu and Lenartowics, 2011). The first stage of analysis involved confirmatory factor analyses and invariance tests for the scales used. Subsequently, multiple regression models made it possible to establish that sociodemographic variables, introduced as covariates, had little influence on the prediction of people's temporal orientation. However, the cultural and psychological variables (long-term orientation, uncertainty avoidance and subjective happiness) introduced as predictors played an important role in the prediction of temporal (current, past and future) focus. Additionally, there are some cultural and psychological predictors of temporal focus specific for each country. Ultimately, structural equation models demonstrated that temporal focus plays the role of the mediator in the relationship between cultural values and subjective happiness in both Ecuador and Russia.
Publisher
Federal State-Financed Educational Institution of Higher Education Moscow State University of Psychology and Education
Subject
Psychology (miscellaneous),Social Psychology,Developmental and Educational Psychology,Cultural Studies,Applied Psychology
Reference38 articles.
1. Deyneka O.S. Psikhologiia preventivnoi politiki pravonarushenii v ekonomike i biznese: ucheb. posobie [Psychology of crime prevention policies in economics and business. Tutorial]. Saarbrucken, Palmarium Academic Publishing, 2013. 410 p. (In Russ.).
2. Golovakha E.I., Kronik A.L. Psikhologicheskoe vremya lichnosti [Psychological time of a personality]. Kiev: NAUKOVA DUMKA, 1984. 128 p. (In Russ.).
3. Kovalyov V.I. Kategoriya vremeni v psikhologii (lichnostnyj aspekt) [The category of time in psychology (personal aspect)]. In L. I. Ancyferovoj (Ed.), Kategorii materialisticheskoj dialektiki v psikhologii [Categories of materialistic dialectology and psychology]. Moscow: Nauka, 1988, pp. 216â230. (In Russ.).
4. Kublickene L.Yu. Organizaciya vremeni lichnostâyu kak pokazatelâ ee aktivnosti [Organization of time by the personality as an indicator of oneâs activity]. Gumanisticheskie problemy psikhologicheskoj teorii [Humanistic problems of psychological theory]. Moscow, 1995, pp. 185â192. (In Russ.).
5. Nestik T.A. Socialânaya psikhologiya vremeni [Social psychology of time]. Moscow: Publ. Institut psikhologii RAN, 2014. 496 p. (In Russ.).
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. Psychological time of green entrepreneurs: a mixed methods study of SMEs;International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research;2023-01-19