Perceived Collective Continuity: Scale Adaption for the Russian Context-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Perceived Collective Continuity: Scale Adaption for the Russian Context

Published:2022 Issue:2 Volume:18 Page:127-135
ISSN:1816-5435
Container-title:Cultural-Historical Psychology
language:
Short-container-title:

Author:

Terskova M.A.¹^ORCID,Bogatyreva N.I.²^ORCID,Ivanov A.A.³^ORCID,Romanova M.O.¹^ORCID,Bykov A.O.¹^ORCID,Ankushev V.V.¹^ORCID

Affiliation:

1. HSE University

2. National Research University “Higher School of Economics”

3. School of Psychology, National Research University Higher School of Economics

Abstract

This article presents the results of the adaptation of the scale for perceived collective continuity in Russian, the construct of which was initially developed by Sani and colleagues in 2007. The phenomenon of perceived collective continuity reflects the perception of groups as entities that are stable over time and transmit traditions from generation to generation. The perception of collective continuity is based on two main dimensions: perceived cultural continuity (perceived continuity of norms and traditions) and perceived historical continuity (perceived relationship between different historical eras and events). Six hundred thirty-seven Russians took part in testing the methodology. The methodology fit well the empirical data, highlighting the two-factor structure of the construct and validity of its scale. In general, the method of perceived collective continuity demonstrates good psychometric indicators and can be used for research in the field of intergroup relations as a reliable and stable toolkit.

Publisher

Federal State-Financed Educational Institution of Higher Education Moscow State University of Psychology and Education

Subject

Psychology (miscellaneous),Social Psychology,Developmental and Educational Psychology,Cultural Studies,Applied Psychology

Link

https://psyjournals.ru/journals/chp/archive/2022_n2/Terskova_et_al.pdf

Reference26 articles.

1. Agadullina E.R., Lovakov A.V. Modelâ izmereniya ingruppovoi identifikatsii: proverka na rossiiskoi vyborke [Model of measurement of ingroup identification; testing on Russian sample]. Psikhologiya. Zhurnal Vysshei shkoly ekonomiki [Psychology. Journal of Higher School of Economics], 2013. Vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 139â153. (In Russ.).

2. Agadullina E.R., Lovakov A.V. Podkhody k ponimaniyu tselostnosti gruppy: estâ li realânye razlichiya? [Approaches to understanding group entitativity: is there a real difference?]. Psikhologiya. Zhurnal Vysshei shkoly ekonomiki [Psychology. Journal of Higher School of Economics], 2017. Vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 536â554. (In Russ.).

3. Shchebetenko S. Ustanovki na cherty lichnosti v kontekste Bolâshoi Pyaterki. Psikhometrika russkoyazychnoi versii Big Five Inventory [Attitudes toward personality traits in Big Five. Psychometrics of Russian version of Big Five Inventory], 2015.

4. Chelovek sovetskii: kak menyalisâ vospriyatie rossiyanami samikh sebya i ikh otnoshenie k SSSR [Soviet person: how was changing perception of Russians of themselves and their attitudes toward USSR] [Elektronnyi resurs]. URL: https:.www.levada.ru/2021/01/14/chelovek-sovetskij-kak-menyalis-vospriyatie-rossiyanami-samih-sebya-i-ih-otnoshenie-k-sssr/ (Accessed: 15.06.2021).

5. Fischer R., Karl J.A. A Primer to (Cross-Cultural) Multi-Group Invariance Testing Possibilities in R. Frontiers in Psychology, 2019. Vol. 10, p. 1507.