New Science Literacy: Problems and Difficulties of Formation-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

New Science Literacy: Problems and Difficulties of Formation

Published:2021 Issue:6 Volume:26 Page:5-24
ISSN:1814-2052
Container-title:Психологическая наука и образование
language:
Short-container-title:

Author:

Margolis A.A.¹^ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Moscow State University of Psychology & Education

Abstract

In a pandemic, science literacy is transformed from a subject of sociological research into a question of the survival of society itself. attitude of various groups and individuals to vaccination shows the real state of science literacy and reveals significant problems in its formation. The article examines the main stages in the development of the concept of natural science (science) literacy and the importance of critical science literacy in a stream containing conflicting scientific information and expert opinions. The article demonstrates the ineffectiveness of formation strategies without specially organized work on the development of initial pre-science ideas in children and adults.

Publisher

Federal State-Financed Educational Institution of Higher Education Moscow State University of Psychology and Education

Subject

Developmental and Educational Psychology,Education,Social Psychology,Psychology (miscellaneous)

Link

https://psyjournals.ru/files/126205/pse_2021_n6_Margolis.pdf

Reference33 articles.

1. Briko N.I., Mindlina A.Ya., Galina N.P., Korshunov V.A., Polibin R.V.Priverzhennostâ razlichnykh grupp naseleniya immunoprofilaktike: kak izmenitâ situatsiyu? Fundamentalânaya i klinicheskaya meditsina, 2019.Vol. 4, p.33.(In Russ.).

2. Vygotskii L.S.K voprosu o razvitii nauchnykh ponyatii v shkolânom vozraste: Predislovie.Zh.I.Shif.Razvitie nauchnykh ponyatii u shkolânika.Moscow; Leningrad: Gos.ucheb.pedagog.izd-vo, 1935.80 p.(In Russ.).

3. Vygotskii L.S.Razvitie zhiteiskikh i nauchnykh ponyatii v shkolânom vozraste (stenogramma doklada v Leningradskom pedagogicheskom institute, 20.05.1933).Umstvennoe razvitie detei v protsesse obucheniya.Moscow: Uchpedgiz, 1935, pp.96â115.

4. Kovaleva G.S.Materialy k zasedaniyu prezidiuma RAO 27 iyunya 2018 g.Vozmozhnye napravle-niya sovershenstvovaniya obshchego obrazovaniya dlya obespecheniya innovacionnogo razvitiya strany (po rezul'tatam mezhdunarodnyh issledovanii kachestva obshchego obrazovaniya) [Materials for the meeting of the RAO Presidium on June 27, 2018.Possible directions of improving general education to ensure the innovative development of the country (based on the results of international studies of the quality of general education)].Otechestvennaya i zarubezhnaya pedagogika [ Domestic and foreign pedagogy], 2018.Vol.2, no.5(55).

5. Branscomb A.W.Knowing how to know.Science, Technology & Human Values, 1981.Vol.6, no.3, pp. 5â9.(In Russ.).

Cited by 6 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Natural science education in the university core curriculum;The Education and science journal;2024-04-17

2. Functional Psychological Literacy of Parents and Teachers as a Condition of Effective Communication with a Child;Psychological Science and Education;2024-03-01

3. COVID-19 Vaccine Education: Is It Effective?;Voprosy obrazovaniya / Educational Studies Moscow;2023-12-27

4. Разработка и стандартизация опросника «Шкала отношения к вакцинации от COVID-19»;Психология. Журнал Высшей школы экономики;2022-09-30

5. Face-to-face, Blended or Online: How Do Students Prefer to Study?;Психологическая наука и образование;2022