Affiliation:
1. Moscow State University of Psychology an Education
2. Moscow State University of Psychology & Education
Abstract
<p>The article presents the results of the qualitative study of Russian child welfare service professionals’ attitudes towards evidence-based practice. Based on a reflexive thematic analysis of interviews with the professionals from 12 social service organizations several themes have been developed and discussed: 1) evidence-based practice as an important current trend, the connection to which gives several advantages (greater attraction for donor organizations and clients, peer recognition); 2) evidence-based practice as an opportunity to master a new culture of justification and communication; 3) evidence-based practice as a search and organization of new forms of interaction with the scientific community. Russian social service professionals tend to accept the instrumental understanding of the evidence-based practice that is transmitted to them by foundations, donor organizations and the expert community, however, their image of practice as a complex activity that requires taking into account many factors and referring to various sources of knowledge can potentially become the basis for more advanced multifaceted and critical understanding of the evidence-based practice – provided the support of such an understanding, including from the scientific community.</p>
Publisher
Moscow State University of Psychology and Education
Subject
Developmental and Educational Psychology,Education,Social Psychology,Psychology (miscellaneous)
Reference17 articles.
1. Busygina N.P., Podushkina T.G., Stanilevsky V.V. Dokazatelny podkhod v obrazovanii: kritichesky analiz aktualnykh diskussiy [Evidence-based education: critical analysis of current discussions] [Elektronnyi resurs]. Psikhologo-pedagogicheskie issledovaniya = Psychological-Educational Studies, 2021. Vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 162–176. DOI:10.17759/psyedu.2021130410 (Accessed 01.12.2022). (In Russ., аbstr. in Engl.).
2. Kvale S. Issledovatelskoe interviyu [Research Interview]. Moscow: Smysl, 2003. (In Russ.).
3. Shteinberg I.E. Logicheskie skhemy obosnovaniya vyborki dlya kachestvennykh interviyu: “vosmiokonnaya model” [A logical scheme to justify the sample in qualitative interview: an “8-Window Sample Model”]. Sotsiologia: metodologia, metody, matematicheskoe modelirovanie (Sociologia: 4M) [Sociology: methodology, methods, mathematical modeling (Sociology: 4M)], 2014, no. 38, pp. 38–71. (In Russ., abstr. In Engl.).
4. Aarons G.A. Mental health provider attitudes toward adoption of evidence-based practice: the Evidence-based Practice Attitude Scale (EBPAS). Mental Health Services Research, 2004. Vol. 6, pp. 61–74. DOI:10.1023/b:mhsr.0000024351.12294.65
5. Aarons G.A., Cafri G., Lugo L., Sawitzky A. Expanding the domains of attitudes towards evidence-based practice: The Evidence-based Practice Attitude Scale-50. Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research, 2012. 39(5), pp. 331–340. DOI:10.1007/s10488-010-0302-3