Learning Self-Reliance and Initiative of High School Students in Educational Modeling-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Learning Self-Reliance and Initiative of High School Students in Educational Modeling

Published:2024-03-01 Issue:1 Volume:29 Page:61-74
ISSN:1814-2052
Container-title:Psychological Science and Education
language:
Short-container-title:

Author:

Chudinova E.V.¹^ORCID,Zaitseva V.Y.²,Minkin D.I.²

Affiliation:

1. Psychological Institute of the Russian Academy of Education

2. school 67

Abstract

<p>The task of the work is to present initiative and independent educational modeling as the highest possible achievement of high school students (15 -17 years old). The application of the "case study" within the framework of a multi-year genetic-modeling experiment made it possible to describe the precedents of educational modeling in high school, demonstrating the initiative and independence of students in modeling. An analysis was carried out of video recordings of 14 lessons on setting and solving one educational problem, the results of a focus group with 5 teachers and written work of 20 eleventh grade students. Due to prior learning based on the principles of learning activities, students of this age are able to invent and analyze modeling tools necessary to capture implicit subject relations, as well as to transform the model by holding the problem for the time necessary to solve it. In this case, the training model acquires the features of an exploratory model. It is shown that the model is not only a means of fixing subject relations for the classroom community, but also a way of expressing their understanding, i.e. a means of communication.</p>

Publisher

Moscow State University of Psychology and Education

Link

https://psyjournals.ru/journals/pse/archive/2024_n1/Chudinova_et_al.pdf

Reference29 articles.

1. Gorbov S.F., Chudinova E.V. Deistvie modelirovaniya v uchebnoi deyatel'nosti shkol'nikov (k postanovke problemy) [The action of modeling in the learning activities of students (to the statement of the problem)]. Psikhologicheskaya nauka i obrazovanie = Psychological Science and Education, 2000, vol. 5, no 2, pp. 96-110. (In Russ.).

2. Davydov V.V. Teoriya razvivayushchego obucheniya [Developmental Learning Theory]. Moscow: Publ. INTOR, 1996. 544 p. (In Russ.).

3. Zaitseva V.E., Chudinova E.V., Minkin D.I. Uchebnoe modelirovanie mikroevolyutsii i ego obrazovatel'nye rezul'taty [Self-active modeling of microevolution and its educational outcomes]. 1 sentyabrya. Biologiya = 1 September. Biology. 2016, no. 11, pp. 28-39. (In Russ.).

4. Nezhnov P.G. Oposredstvovanie i spontannost' v modeli «kul'turnogo razvitiya [Mediation and spontaneity in the model of "cultural development" (to the statement of the problem)]. Vestnik Mosk. Un-ta=Bulletin of Moscow University, series 14, Psikhologiya=psychology, 2007, no 1, pp. 133-146. (In Russ.)

5. Nechaev N.N. Modelirovanie v usloviyakh tsifrovizatsii obrazovaniya: psikhologo-pedagogicheskie aspekty [Mediation and spontaneity in the model of "cultural development" (to the statement of the problem)]. Tsifrovaya gumanitaristika i tekhnologii v obrazovanii (DHTE 2020): sb. materialov Vserossiiskoi nauchno-prakticheskoi konferentsii s mezhdunarodnym uchastiem. 19—21 noyabrya 2020 g. / Pod red. M.G. Sorokovoi, E.G. Dozortsevoi, A.Yu. Shemanova. Moscow: Publ. FGBOU VO MGPPU, 2020, pp. 353–364. (In Russ.).